From: duchangbin <changbin.du@huawei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: duchangbin <changbin.du@huawei.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf build: Fix up broken capstone feature detection fast path
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 03:26:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76c92af3b3544f8a9fed412fc287947d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zry0sepD5Ppa5YKP@x1>
Hi, Arnaldo,
How about workaround it by rename the 'bpf_insn' in capstione?
Change test-libcapstone.c as:
#define bpf_insn capstone_bpf_insn
#include <capstone/capstone.h>
#undef bpf_insn
I haven't tried it but seems feasible.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 10:44:17AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> The capstone devel headers define 'struct bpf_insn' in a way that clashes with
> what is in the libbpf devel headers, so we so far need to avoid including both.
>
> This is happening on the tools/build/feature/test-all.c file, where we try
> building all the expected set of libraries to be normally available on a
> system:
>
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ cat /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-all.make.output
> In file included from test-bpf.c:3,
> from test-all.c:150:
> /home/acme/git/perf-tools-next/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h:77:8: error: ‘bpf_insn’ defined as wrong kind of tag
> 77 | struct bpf_insn {
> | ^~~~~~~~
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ cat /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-all.make.output
>
> When doing so there is a trick where we define main to be
> main_test_libcapstone, then include the individual
> tools/build/feture/test-libcapstone.c capability query test, and then we undef
> 'main' because we'll do it all over again with the next expected library to
> be tested (at this time 'lzma').
>
> To complete this mechanism we need to, in test-all.c 'main' routine, to
> call main_test_libcapstone(), which isn't being done, so the effect of
> adding references to capstone in test-all.c are not achieved.
>
> The only thing that is happening is that test-all.c is failing to build and thus
> all the tests will have to be done individually, which nullifies the test-all.c
> single build speedup.
>
> So lets remove references to capstone from test-all.c to see if this makes it
> build again so that we get faster builds or go on fixing up whatever is
> preventing us to get that benefit.
>
> Nothing: after this fix we get a clean test-all.c build and get the build speedup back:
>
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ cat /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-all.make.output
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ cat /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-all.
> test-all.bin test-all.d test-all.make.output
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ cat /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-all.make.output
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ ldd /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/feature/test-all.bin
> linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007f13277a1000)
> libpython3.12.so.1.0 => /lib64/libpython3.12.so.1.0 (0x00007f1326e00000)
> libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00007f13274be000)
> libtraceevent.so.1 => /lib64/libtraceevent.so.1 (0x00007f1327496000)
> libtracefs.so.1 => /lib64/libtracefs.so.1 (0x00007f132746f000)
> libcrypto.so.3 => /lib64/libcrypto.so.3 (0x00007f1326800000)
> libunwind-x86_64.so.8 => /lib64/libunwind-x86_64.so.8 (0x00007f1327452000)
> libunwind.so.8 => /lib64/libunwind.so.8 (0x00007f1327436000)
> liblzma.so.5 => /lib64/liblzma.so.5 (0x00007f1327403000)
> libdw.so.1 => /lib64/libdw.so.1 (0x00007f1326d6f000)
> libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x00007f13273e2000)
> libelf.so.1 => /lib64/libelf.so.1 (0x00007f1326d53000)
> libnuma.so.1 => /lib64/libnuma.so.1 (0x00007f13273d4000)
> libslang.so.2 => /lib64/libslang.so.2 (0x00007f1326400000)
> libperl.so.5.38 => /lib64/libperl.so.5.38 (0x00007f1326000000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f1325e0f000)
> libzstd.so.1 => /lib64/libzstd.so.1 (0x00007f1326741000)
> /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f13277a3000)
> libbz2.so.1 => /lib64/libbz2.so.1 (0x00007f1326d3f000)
> libcrypt.so.2 => /lib64/libcrypt.so.2 (0x00007f1326d07000)
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$
>
> And when having capstone-devel installed we get it detected and linked with
> perf, allowing us to benefit from the features that it enables:
>
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ rpm -q capstone-devel
> capstone-devel-5.0.1-3.fc40.x86_64
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ ldd /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/perf | grep capstone
> libcapstone.so.5 => /lib64/libcapstone.so.5 (0x00007fe6a5c00000)
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$ /tmp/build/perf-tools-next/perf -vv | grep cap
> libcapstone: [ on ] # HAVE_LIBCAPSTONE_SUPPORT
> ⬢[acme@toolbox perf-tools-next]$
>
> Fixes: 8b767db3309595a2 ("perf: build: introduce the libcapstone")
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@huawei.com>
> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/build/feature/test-all.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/build/feature/test-all.c b/tools/build/feature/test-all.c
> index dd0a18c2ef8fc080..6f4bf386a3b5c4b0 100644
> --- a/tools/build/feature/test-all.c
> +++ b/tools/build/feature/test-all.c
> @@ -134,10 +134,6 @@
> #undef main
> #endif
>
> -#define main main_test_libcapstone
> -# include "test-libcapstone.c"
> -#undef main
> -
> #define main main_test_lzma
> # include "test-lzma.c"
> #undef main
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
--
Cheers,
Changbin Du
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-15 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-14 13:44 [PATCH 1/1] perf build: Fix up broken capstone feature detection fast path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-08-15 3:26 ` duchangbin [this message]
2024-08-15 14:46 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-08-15 17:11 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76c92af3b3544f8a9fed412fc287947d@huawei.com \
--to=changbin.du@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox