From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419A8C55179 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0878F207C3 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="scdAI9NI" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2505130AbgJ0Dhz (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 23:37:55 -0400 Received: from z5.mailgun.us ([104.130.96.5]:43522 "EHLO z5.mailgun.us" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2410963AbgJ0Dhy (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2020 23:37:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1603769873; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=D4ptAK/G5fQCiIbsv81pzLjHpEOeMVA9CSSPFZvFg48=; b=scdAI9NIbovs3QOzhox4o44ZXMK/bPVg+2DUxZaah345Ob9oENRn3l5Z1ml1kcLqtsLA8Plp 0X+kGgk980vxW49v+AuZYwuJzyvaT4VZInfn+vfm1EJ7r39FdRjY1Cmk04CXGJzVprYH+gJc DDUdIrdIU1krFJnTZNbBBvDVG3M= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.96.5 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0MWYwYSIsICJsaW51eC1rZXJuZWxAdmdlci5rZXJuZWwub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n01.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5f9796115c97867acedd99fc (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:37:53 GMT Sender: cang=codeaurora.org@mg.codeaurora.org Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8BBABC433FE; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cang) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 036D7C433F0; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:37:52 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:37:52 +0800 From: Can Guo To: Jaegeuk Kim Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, bvanassche@acm.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] scsi: ufs: atomic update for clkgating_enable In-Reply-To: <20201027033311.GA1745317@google.com> References: <20201026195124.363096-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20201026195124.363096-2-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20d1c2ca06e95beb207fd4ba1b61dc80@codeaurora.org> <20201027033311.GA1745317@google.com> Message-ID: <76df977d164683c7404d2dc702f2e5ad@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: cang@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020-10-27 11:33, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 10/27, Can Guo wrote: >> On 2020-10-27 03:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >> > From: Jaegeuk Kim >> > >> > When giving a stress test which enables/disables clkgating, we hit >> > device >> > timeout sometimes. This patch avoids subtle racy condition to address >> > it. >> > >> > Note that, this requires a patch to address the device stuck by >> > REQ_CLKS_OFF in >> > __ufshcd_release(). >> > >> > The fix is "scsi: ufs: avoid to call REQ_CLKS_OFF to CLKS_OFF". >> >> Why don't you just squash the fix into this one? > > I'm seeing this patch just revealed that problem. That scenario (back to back calling of ufshcd_release()) only happens when you stress the clkgate_enable sysfs node, so let's keep the fix as one to make things simple. What do you think? Thanks, Can Guo. > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Can Guo. >> >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim >> > --- >> > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 12 ++++++------ >> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c >> > index cc8d5f0c3fdc..6c9269bffcbd 100644 >> > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c >> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c >> > @@ -1808,19 +1808,19 @@ static ssize_t >> > ufshcd_clkgate_enable_store(struct device *dev, >> > return -EINVAL; >> > >> > value = !!value; >> > + >> > + spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); >> > if (value == hba->clk_gating.is_enabled) >> > goto out; >> > >> > - if (value) { >> > - ufshcd_release(hba); >> > - } else { >> > - spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags); >> > + if (value) >> > + __ufshcd_release(hba); >> > + else >> > hba->clk_gating.active_reqs++; >> > - spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags); >> > - } >> > >> > hba->clk_gating.is_enabled = value; >> > out: >> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags); >> > return count; >> > }