From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C94AC432C3 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3A064E84 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 14:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232585AbhBVOXx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:23:53 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:12199 "EHLO szxga04-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232153AbhBVOM3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:12:29 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DkkZz72WNzlNcN; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:09:47 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.102.197] (10.67.102.197) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:11:37 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH stable-rc queue/4.9 1/1] futex: Provide distinct return value when owner is exiting To: Greg KH CC: , , , , , References: <20210222070328.102384-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com> <20210222070328.102384-2-nixiaoming@huawei.com> <3bc570f6-f8af-b0a2-4d62-13ed4adc1f33@huawei.com> From: Xiaoming Ni Message-ID: <76f6a446-41db-3b7a-dcab-a85d0841654f@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 22:11:37 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.102.197] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2021/2/22 20:09, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:54:06PM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote: >> On 2021/2/22 18:16, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 03:03:28PM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote: >>>> From: Thomas Gleixner >>>> >>>> commit ac31c7ff8624409ba3c4901df9237a616c187a5d upstream. >>> This commit is already in the 4.9 tree. If the backport was incorrect, >>> say that here, and describe what went wrong and why this commit fixes >>> it. >>> >>> Also state what commit this fixes as well, otherwise this changelog just >>> looks like it is being applied again to the tree, which doesn't make >>> much sense. >>> >>> thanks, >>> >>> greg k-h >>> . >> >> I wrote a cover for it. but forgot to adjust the title of the cover: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210222070328.102384-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com/ >> >> >> I found a dead code in the queue/4.9 branch of the stable-rc repository. >> >> 2021-02-03: >> commit c27f392040e2f6 ("futex: Provide distinct return value when >> owner is exiting") >> The function handle_exit_race does not exist. Therefore, the >> change in handle_exit_race() is ignored in the patch round. >> >> 2021-02-22: >> commit e55cb811e612 ("futex: Cure exit race") >> Define the handle_exit_race() function, >> but no branch in the function returns EBUSY. >> As a result, dead code occurs in the attach_to_pi_owner(): >> >> int ret = handle_exit_race(uaddr, uval, p); >> ... >> if (ret == -EBUSY) >> *exiting = p; /* dead code */ >> >> To fix the dead code, modify the commit e55cb811e612 ("futex: Cure exit >> race"), >> or install a patch to incorporate the changes in handle_exit_race(). >> >> I am unfamiliar with the processing of the stable-rc queue branch, >> and I cannot find the patch mail of the current branch in >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=%22futex%3A+Cure+exit+race%22 >> Therefore, I re-integrated commit ac31c7ff8624 ("futex: Provide distinct >> return value when owner is exiting"). >> And wrote a cover (but forgot to adjust the title of the cover): >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210222070328.102384-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com/ > > So this is a "fixup" patch, right? > > Please clearly label it as such in your patch description and resend > this as what is here I can not apply at all. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > . > Thank you for your guidance. I have updated the patch description and resent the patch based on v4.9.258-rc1 https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210222125352.110124-1-nixiaoming@huawei.com/ Thanks Xiaoming Ni