Re: [net-next RFC PATCH 0/6] Add support for qca8k mdio rw in Ethernet packet

[Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>]

On 12/7/21 7:15 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 03:59:36PM +0100, Ansuel Smith wrote:
>> Hi, this is still WIP and currently has some problem but I would love if
>> someone can give this a superficial review and answer to some problem
>> with this.
>>
>> The main reason for this is that we notice some routing problem in the
>> switch and it seems assisted learning is needed. Considering mdio is
>> quite slow due to the indirect write using this Ethernet alternative way
>> seems to be quicker.
>>
>> The qca8k switch supports a special way to pass mdio read/write request
>> using specially crafted Ethernet packet.
> 
> Oh! Cool! Marvell has this as well, and i suspect a few others. It is
> something i've wanted to work on for a long long time, but never had
> the opportunity.
> 
> This also means that, even if you are focusing on qca8k, please try to
> think what could be generic, and what should specific to the
> qca8k. The idea of sending an Ethernet frame and sometime later
> receiving a reply should be generic and usable for other DSA
> drivers. The contents of those frames needs to be driver specific.
> How we hook this into MDIO might also be generic, maybe.
> 
> I will look at your questions later, but soon.

There was a priori attempt from Vivien to add support for mv88e6xxx over
RMU frames:

https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg298317.html

This gets interesting because the switch's control path moves from MDIO
to Ethernet and there is not really an "ethernet bus" though we could
certainly come up with one. We have mdio-i2c, so maybe we should have
mdio-ethernet?
-- 
Florian