From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:19:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:19:45 -0400 Received: from roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com ([24.169.102.121]:44710 "EHLO roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:19:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:19:53 -0400 From: Chris Mason To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dieter_N=FCtzel?= , Beau Kuiper , Andrew Morton cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Robert Love , Linux Kernel List , ReiserFS List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Significant performace improvements on reiserfs systems Message-ID: <773660000.1001006393@tiny> In-Reply-To: <20010920170812.CCCACE641B@ns1.suse.com> In-Reply-To: <20010920170812.CCCACE641B@ns1.suse.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, September 20, 2001 07:08:25 PM +0200 Dieter Nützel wrote: > Please have a look at Robert Love's Linux kernel preemption patches and > the conversation about my reported latency results. > Andrew Morton has patches that significantly improve the reiserfs latency, looks like the last one he sent me was 2.4.7-pre9. He and I did a bunch of work to make sure they introduce schedules only when it was safe. Andrew, are these still maintained or should I pull out the reiserfs bits? -chris