From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI/ASPM: Handle link retraining race
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 12:30:34 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <777a753-42f0-6616-5cc0-fceb157acc2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZGaquEqo/psIH14Y@bhelgaas>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6235 bytes --]
On Thu, 18 May 2023, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 11:39:23AM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > Implementation Note at the end of PCIe r6.0.1 sec 7.5.3.7 recommends
> > handling LTSSM race to ensure link retraining acquires correct
> > parameters from the LNKCTL register. According to the implementation
> > note, LTSSM might transition into Recovery or Configuration state
> > independently of the driver requesting it, and if retraining due to
> > such an event is still ongoing, the value written into the LNKCTL
> > register might not be considered by the link retraining.
> >
> > Ensure link training bit is clear before toggling link retraining bit
> > to meet the requirements of the Implementation Note.
> >
> > Fixes: 7d715a6c1ae5 ("PCI: add PCI Express ASPM support")
> > Suggested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>
> Thanks for this!
>
> The existing pcie_retrain_link() and pcie_wait_for_retrain() both
> return bool, but neither is named as a predicate, and it's always a
> little hard for me to keep track of what the true/false return values
> mean.
>
> I propose tweaking them so they both return 0 for success or
> -ETIMEDOUT for failure. What do you think? It does make the patch
> bigger, which is kind of unfortunate.
It's better, yes, unless stable folks think it's not a minimal change.
As a confirmation for your return tweak improving things, I recall that I
had to be careful with the bool in this case for the reasons you mention
(it requires more mental capacity and verification which way the return
is).
(Also, expect the error handling reindent to cause a conflict with the RMW
series.)
--
i.
> commit f55ef626b57f ("PCI/ASPM: Avoid link retraining race")
> parent e8d05f522fae
> Author: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Tue May 2 11:39:23 2023 +0300
>
> PCI/ASPM: Avoid link retraining race
>
> PCIe r6.0.1, sec 7.5.3.7, recommends setting the link control parameters,
> then waiting for the Link Training bit to be clear before setting the
> Retrain Link bit.
>
> This avoids a race where the LTSSM may not use the updated parameters if it
> is already in the midst of link training because of other normal link
> activity.
>
> Wait for the Link Training bit to be clear before toggling the Retrain Link
> bit to ensure that the LTSSM uses the updated link control parameters.
>
> [bhelgaas: commit log, return 0 (success)/-ETIMEDOUT instead of bool for
> both pcie_wait_for_retrain() and the existing pcie_retrain_link()]
> Suggested-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Fixes: 7d715a6c1ae5 ("PCI: add PCI Express ASPM support")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230502083923.34562-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 72cdb30a924a..3aa73ecdf86f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -193,12 +193,39 @@ static void pcie_clkpm_cap_init(struct pcie_link_state *link, int blacklist)
> link->clkpm_disable = blacklist ? 1 : 0;
> }
>
> -static bool pcie_retrain_link(struct pcie_link_state *link)
> +static int pcie_wait_for_retrain(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> - struct pci_dev *parent = link->pdev;
> unsigned long end_jiffies;
> u16 reg16;
>
> + /* Wait for Link Training to be cleared by hardware */
> + end_jiffies = jiffies + LINK_RETRAIN_TIMEOUT;
> + do {
> + pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, ®16);
> + if (!(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT))
> + return 0;
> + msleep(1);
> + } while (time_before(jiffies, end_jiffies));
> +
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +}
> +
> +static int pcie_retrain_link(struct pcie_link_state *link)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *parent = link->pdev;
> + int rc;
> + u16 reg16;
> +
> + /*
> + * Ensure the updated LNKCTL parameters are used during link
> + * training by checking that there is no ongoing link training to
> + * avoid LTSSM race as recommended in Implementation Note at the
> + * end of PCIe r6.0.1 sec 7.5.3.7.
> + */
> + rc = pcie_wait_for_retrain(parent);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> pcie_capability_read_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, ®16);
> reg16 |= PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_RL;
> pcie_capability_write_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, reg16);
> @@ -212,15 +239,7 @@ static bool pcie_retrain_link(struct pcie_link_state *link)
> pcie_capability_write_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, reg16);
> }
>
> - /* Wait for link training end. Break out after waiting for timeout */
> - end_jiffies = jiffies + LINK_RETRAIN_TIMEOUT;
> - do {
> - pcie_capability_read_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, ®16);
> - if (!(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT))
> - break;
> - msleep(1);
> - } while (time_before(jiffies, end_jiffies));
> - return !(reg16 & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_LT);
> + return pcie_wait_for_retrain(parent);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -289,15 +308,15 @@ static void pcie_aspm_configure_common_clock(struct pcie_link_state *link)
> reg16 &= ~PCI_EXP_LNKCTL_CCC;
> pcie_capability_write_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, reg16);
>
> - if (pcie_retrain_link(link))
> - return;
> + if (pcie_retrain_link(link)) {
>
> - /* Training failed. Restore common clock configurations */
> - pci_err(parent, "ASPM: Could not configure common clock\n");
> - list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list)
> - pcie_capability_write_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
> + /* Training failed. Restore common clock configurations */
> + pci_err(parent, "ASPM: Could not configure common clock\n");
> + list_for_each_entry(child, &linkbus->devices, bus_list)
> + pcie_capability_write_word(child, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL,
> child_reg[PCI_FUNC(child->devfn)]);
> - pcie_capability_write_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, parent_reg);
> + pcie_capability_write_word(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCTL, parent_reg);
> + }
> }
>
> /* Convert L0s latency encoding to ns */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-19 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-02 8:39 [PATCH 1/1] PCI/ASPM: Handle link retraining race Ilpo Järvinen
2023-05-18 22:46 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2023-05-19 9:30 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2023-05-19 13:29 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=777a753-42f0-6616-5cc0-fceb157acc2@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox