From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 226C8382; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 04:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708577738; cv=none; b=E/RjknSfrukGxNGW4BFFOk4yBGZeKf9cHybAABo9Zxk31kNrxG5d8P8vGZtftz8StAMAO608sMxZmzdgyJs9Gf635nFApUOgLNG8sxweUj7qU6Ulr+yHV29RqPmnvp8q8d5Y9KgBoHWAiClDRbKfS7pS0yQGXAwu2G58jJGyM0k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708577738; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0twjdnUZK3fCwX0EY33IZ2Wjb+zn9RhH3jERrQuyxng=; h=Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:From:Cc:To:Date; b=JF5CCkxDq8wd42xGPMjo9IGU68G1nGNA5xhLgGyL5hxZiEQbCYFRmFfkopSGXb/+v3ClPUqQKaH7jKj7sCyd5o294JdilHv2BSWAfcUbAgpZBn66imWR60Pv5NMB4tqSKawXnCIhsNjeDpRKxslg6iXrmiEd3b54V8HnZsHx/j8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JRhCVowN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JRhCVowN" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71AEDC433C7; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 04:55:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708577737; bh=0twjdnUZK3fCwX0EY33IZ2Wjb+zn9RhH3jERrQuyxng=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=JRhCVowN1kGPufF9VMiWE1+2taFg1JqW+zEhyPT263uu2Gx8JFjv25+FVEk9Eq7nQ 3TgCaMS/MKZ4Jx23YGDtfe0p7We1We+fb/hz7AOPD8UOob5F8IeSIgFvBZCSZYDxaH l1qdP5owoOXLwXXy6H/1Ex7mC6i7eMjY1ov1sNgbnVzwT6IJ/IvpApEL/lv1tdnWWb U3wUaSA0qbSId7k0//A+Z5xHrIQbY1aaspx7yp+MWxfmzxljGAJ1hQ9OTcpNCcOQXr JGDnMLNblWPsVqdXypDyPWgZJ12kJYWp1tKnhQeIxRsdBBq0xilroSvJtsnLYOOre0 NukMhNoqZ67cQ== Message-ID: <779e41e11d90cdf05ead7932de07192d.sboyd@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20240219105125.956278-1-wenst@chromium.org> References: <20240219105125.956278-1-wenst@chromium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: mt8183: Correct parent of CLK_INFRA_SSPM_32K_SELF From: Stephen Boyd Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Chen-Yu Tsai , Matthias Brugger Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 20:55:35 -0800 User-Agent: alot/0.10 Quoting Chen-Yu Tsai (2024-02-19 02:51:24) > CLK_INFRA_SSPM_32K_SELF has the "f_f26m_ck" clock assigned as its parent. > This is inconsistent as the clock is part of a group that are all gates > without dividers, and this makes the kernel think it runs at 26 MHz. >=20 > After clarification from MediaTek engineers, the correct parent is > actually the system 32 KHz clock. >=20 > Fixes: 1eb8d61ac5c9 ("clk: mediatek: mt8183: Add back SSPM related clocks= ") > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > --- Applied to clk-next