From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7421B1BC20; Fri, 16 Feb 2024 09:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708075671; cv=none; b=VWWAzOdJo5RUakRCOLTJYvj5DUeIx6FUXtLZ9V5hxSKH9oC12uwv/ijXagdW7pvY5NksbddRC0wArFnpuKZjTTZvxicgSVcH40RlMwNCT2bA2hauGPo+VLDeo9kx0lukScGU7hJ3c+Z/Fc101lsDpJE0K33Z3dJ8DRwoW11DLuo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708075671; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uDyNk/CUqvtdvvFmpldWQBvEpFAGBNu8KcXmCGgBUNg=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DzAgT7nHBL49VIFv2H24kBAvQC8XNhoms8rY3XOQZE7+PGUtMdWqgZiZTcHnFxIiYz5BTZGVdc7wejzgXGMQbM2V8BlGWYw8Wu/t1OzO5mGZHV9XOHPeuksHsCVkGHAlguCzokCGQcm24aa+mFRpvdyDFLA+qxjEVTkx/Dm7AJo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Cs39C+Ih; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Cs39C+Ih" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708075670; x=1739611670; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=uDyNk/CUqvtdvvFmpldWQBvEpFAGBNu8KcXmCGgBUNg=; b=Cs39C+IhjtxC6VBAXca8fgFeah+Ao1Sk/2Y1K5mOB7sdj1Mzj+PKS2Xz Z7iuJgzA4a0yv+UAZxsVB+eWJn70zMr9rbIXa50ioiQbc2tsQYOEybobU y4kV+bYtloo4ImspWVqCjM6FWBiruWs4gcSYpeGmXp6Dj210g1Li9D9+d b1Ot52DOGqhF/S6/kmHT0qEbO8DHwwdTGI/TD9ETL+X53HEeuujku2r0Y SonNHQ5lt26Z3sk91zMlfirE1gsgrFAmh/W/tZZfJFyX3oHaDHrv6E+b9 ExJCdESN7hfXBpUjqu7abtEH4WLJKSJ3AadBBNZGloedIoT1wszxNqpHb A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10985"; a="2070894" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,164,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="2070894" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2024 01:27:48 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10985"; a="826556602" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,164,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="826556602" Received: from ijarvine-desk1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.94.248.234]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2024 01:27:45 -0800 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:27:40 +0200 (EET) To: Szilard Fabian cc: W_Armin@gmx.de, Hans de Goede , jwoithe@just42.net, LKML , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop: Add battery charge control support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <77f71c25-a3d5-225e-9fc4-1b9d8ad3797d@linux.intel.com> References: <20240129163502.161409-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <20240129175714.164326-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <20240207023031.56805-2-szfabian@bluemarch.art> <43960922-d6bb-e5f6-2156-f1b35142244a@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323328-679996737-1708075660=:1097" This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-679996737-1708075660=:1097 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Szilard Fabian wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:34:00PM +0100, Ilpo J=C3=A4rvinen wrote: > > Why is this posted as RFC? > > It's my third patch into the Linux kernel (the first two being a i8042 qu= irk > table related patch) and I was not sure if everything is okay with v1/v2. > But it looks like the patch matured enough in v3 to reach it's near final > form and there was not too much to comment anymore. Sorry for any > inconvenience I've caused with that. No problem. I asked just to gauge if there was something you still planned= =20 to do in addition to what is there. I kind of guessed that in this case=20 "RFC" mostly meant "I'm being careful here" more than that you'd have=20 something you felt still missing from the patch. :-) --=20 i. > Thanks for your feedback. I'll post v4 in a moment. >=20 > Regards, > Szilard >=20 >=20 --8323328-679996737-1708075660=:1097--