Re: [Lse-tech] [patch] sched-domain cleanups, sched-2.6.5-rc2-mm2-A3

Ingo Molnar
2004-03-30T08:18:13Z

* Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:

> > ok, could you try min_interval,max_interval and busy_factor all with a
> > value as 4, in sched.h's SD_NODE_INIT template? (again, only for testing
> > purposes.)
>
> I kept the old patch and made these changes. The results are much more
> consistent now 3+x CPU. I still get varyations of ~2GB/s, but I had
> this with older kernels too.

great.

now, could you try the following patch, against vanilla -mm5:

redhat.com/~mingo/scheduler-patches/sched2.patch

this includes 'context balancing' and doesnt touch the NUMA async
balancing tunables. Do you get better performance than with stock -mm5?

Ingo