The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
To: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "sashiko-bot@kernel.org" <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Top-up memory caches when retrying "map private PFN"
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2026 20:38:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7867c759880de0ea4628deccfaa077a5d1c5fce9.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806214050.78058-4-seanjc@google.com>

On Thu, 2026-08-06 at 14:40 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> When mapping a private PFN in TDX's post-populate callback, top-up the
> memory caches on every attempt to map the PFN to harden against bugs in the
> map flow that could consume cache entries even if mapping ultimately fails.
> E.g. as pointed out by Sashiko, the in-progress Dynamic PAMT support could
> consume PAMT cache entries on TDX-Module lock contention.

I think it is the same for the other caches consumed by the fault. I guess
"e.g." covers it. But it's not new after DPAMT.

> 
> Harden KVM even though consuming an entry on failure is considered a KVM
> bug, as retry is uncommon
> 

The locks held by the sole call path will prevent retries from being needed due
to TDX-specific details. So in the place where this code lives, it is a bug. But
can't really be hit. To me "retry is uncommon" sounds like it's a rare case that
is hittable. I guess you mean only in the uncommon case of bugs.

> , top-up is "free" if there's no work to be done,
> and populating a TDX guest's memory is a slow path, i.e. there's no
> meaningful downside to the hardening.
> 
> Reported-by: Sashiko Bot <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260718061050.E17B01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---

Thanks! And...

Reviewed-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 21:40 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Fix pre-fault and map private loops Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Reload MMU on *every* page pre-fault attempt/iteration Sean Christopherson
2026-08-07  8:58   ` Huang, Kai
2026-08-07 19:04   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-08-07 19:11     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Harden "map private PFN" against unexpected root invalidation Sean Christopherson
2026-08-07 20:26   ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-08-07 22:18     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Top-up memory caches when retrying "map private PFN" Sean Christopherson
2026-08-07 20:38   ` Edgecombe, Rick P [this message]
2026-08-07 22:13     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-08-06 21:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Add sanity check to detect stale page faults in " Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7867c759880de0ea4628deccfaa077a5d1c5fce9.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox