public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
To: Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@amd.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	ashish.kalra@amd.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] amd/iommu: Preserve domain ids inside the kdump kernel
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:20:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78a4598d-5d35-4fd0-a830-a740076aba41@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251114104442.23296-2-sarunkod@amd.com>



On 11/14/2025 4:14 PM, Sairaj Kodilkar wrote:
> Currently AMD IOMMU driver does not reserve domain ids programmed in the
> DTE while reusing the device table inside kdump kernel. This can cause
> reallocation of these domain ids for newer domains that are created by
> the kdump kernel, which can lead to potential IO_PAGE_FAULTs
> 
> Hence reserve these ids inside pdom_ids.
> 
> Fixes: 38e5f33ee359 ("iommu/amd: Reuse device table for kdump")
> Signed-off-by: Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@amd.com>

I missed to inform you. This was reported by Jason while reviewing nested
series. So

Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>

-Vasant

> ---
>  drivers/iommu/amd/init.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
> index f2991c11867c..9375fba1071c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/amd/init.c
> @@ -1136,9 +1136,13 @@ static void set_dte_bit(struct dev_table_entry *dte, u8 bit)
>  static bool __reuse_device_table(struct amd_iommu *iommu)
>  {
>  	struct amd_iommu_pci_seg *pci_seg = iommu->pci_seg;
> -	u32 lo, hi, old_devtb_size;
> +	struct dev_table_entry *old_dev_tbl_entry;
> +	u32 lo, hi, old_devtb_size, devid;
>  	phys_addr_t old_devtb_phys;
> +	u16 dom_id;
> +	bool dte_v;
>  	u64 entry;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	/* Each IOMMU use separate device table with the same size */
>  	lo = readl(iommu->mmio_base + MMIO_DEV_TABLE_OFFSET);
> @@ -1173,6 +1177,25 @@ static bool __reuse_device_table(struct amd_iommu *iommu)
>  		return false;
>  	}
>  
> +	for (devid = 0; devid <= pci_seg->last_bdf; devid++) {
> +		old_dev_tbl_entry = &pci_seg->old_dev_tbl_cpy[devid];
> +		dte_v = old_dev_tbl_entry->data[0] & DTE_FLAG_V;
> +		dom_id = old_dev_tbl_entry->data[1] & DEV_DOMID_MASK;
> +
> +		if (!dte_v || !dom_id)
> +			continue;
> +		/*
> +		 * ID reseveration can fail with -ENOSPC when there
> +		 * are multiple devices present in the same domain,
> +		 * hence check only for -ENOMEM.
> +		 */
> +		ret = ida_alloc_range(&pdom_ids, dom_id, dom_id, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +		if (ret == -ENOMEM) {
> +			pr_err("Failed to reserve domain ID 0x%x\n", dom_id);
> +			return false;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	return true;
>  }
>  


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-19 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-14 10:44 [PATCH 0/2] amd/iommu: Preserve domain ids inside the kdump kernel Sairaj Kodilkar
2025-11-14 10:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Sairaj Kodilkar
2025-11-17  5:21   ` Ankit Soni
2025-11-19 10:50   ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2025-11-19 13:43     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-20  5:02       ` Sairaj Kodilkar
2025-11-20 12:56         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-21  5:21           ` Sairaj Kodilkar
2025-11-20  6:22       ` Vasant Hegde
2025-11-20  6:56       ` Vasant Hegde
2025-11-14 10:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] amd/iommu: Make protection domain ID functions non-static Sairaj Kodilkar
2025-11-19 10:47   ` Vasant Hegde
2025-11-19 13:47   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78a4598d-5d35-4fd0-a830-a740076aba41@amd.com \
    --to=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sarunkod@amd.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox