From: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
valentin.schneider@arm.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Jiang Biao <benbjiang@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] sched/fair: select idle cpu from idle cpumask in sched domain
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 17:21:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78d608f2-b974-e940-da32-b37777bc405a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200916110039.GG3117@suse.de>
On 2020/9/16 19:00, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:31:03PM +0800, Aubrey Li wrote:
>> Added idle cpumask to track idle cpus in sched domain. When a CPU
>> enters idle, its corresponding bit in the idle cpumask will be set,
>> and when the CPU exits idle, its bit will be cleared.
>>
>> When a task wakes up to select an idle cpu, scanning idle cpumask
>> has low cost than scanning all the cpus in last level cache domain,
>> especially when the system is heavily loaded.
>>
>> The following benchmarks were tested on a x86 4 socket system with
>> 24 cores per socket and 2 hyperthreads per core, total 192 CPUs:
>>
>
> This still appears to be tied to turning the tick off. An idle CPU
> available for computation does not necessarily have the tick turned off
> if it's for short periods of time. When nohz is disabled or a machine is
> active enough that CPUs are not disabling the tick, select_idle_cpu may
> fail to select an idle CPU and instead stack tasks on the old CPU.
>
> The other subtlety is that select_idle_sibling() currently allows a
> SCHED_IDLE cpu to be used as a wakeup target. The CPU is not really
> idle as such, it's simply running a low priority task that is suitable
> for preemption. I suspect this patch breaks that.
>
Thanks!
I shall post a v3 with performance data, I made a quick uperf testing and
found the benefit is still there. So I posted the patch here and looking
forward to your comments before I start the benchmarks.
Thanks,
-Aubrey
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
index fb11091129b3..43a641d26154 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
@@ -65,8 +65,21 @@ struct sched_domain_shared {
atomic_t ref;
atomic_t nr_busy_cpus;
int has_idle_cores;
+ /*
+ * Span of all idle CPUs in this domain.
+ *
+ * NOTE: this field is variable length. (Allocated dynamically
+ * by attaching extra space to the end of the structure,
+ * depending on how many CPUs the kernel has booted up with)
+ */
+ unsigned long idle_cpus_span[];
};
+static inline struct cpumask *sds_idle_cpus(struct sched_domain_shared *sds)
+{
+ return to_cpumask(sds->idle_cpus_span);
+}
+
struct sched_domain {
/* These fields must be setup */
struct sched_domain __rcu *parent; /* top domain must be null terminated */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6b3b59cc51d6..9a3c82645472 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6023,6 +6023,26 @@ void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
rcu_read_unlock();
}
+/*
+ * Update cpu idle state and record this information
+ * in sd_llc_shared->idle_cpus_span.
+ */
+void update_idle_cpumask(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ struct sched_domain *sd;
+ int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu));
+ if (!sd || !sd->shared)
+ goto unlock;
+ if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu) || !sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
+ goto unlock;
+ cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, sds_idle_cpus(sd->shared));
+unlock:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
/*
* Scan the entire LLC domain for idle cores; this dynamically switches off if
* there are no idle cores left in the system; tracked through
@@ -6136,7 +6156,12 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
time = cpu_clock(this);
- cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
+ /*
+ * sched_domain_shared is set only at shared cache level,
+ * this works only because select_idle_cpu is called with
+ * sd_llc.
+ */
+ cpumask_and(cpus, sds_idle_cpus(sd->shared), p->cpus_ptr);
for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
if (!--nr)
@@ -6712,6 +6737,10 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
if (want_affine)
current->recent_used_cpu = cpu;
+
+ sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, new_cpu));
+ if (sd && sd->shared)
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(new_cpu, sds_idle_cpus(sd->shared));
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -10871,6 +10900,9 @@ static void set_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first)
/* ensure bandwidth has been allocated on our new cfs_rq */
account_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq, 0);
}
+ /* Update idle cpumask if task has idle policy */
+ if (unlikely(task_has_idle_policy(p)))
+ update_idle_cpumask(rq);
}
void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
index 1ae95b9150d3..876dfdfe35bb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -405,6 +405,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
static void set_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, bool first)
{
update_idle_core(rq);
+ update_idle_cpumask(rq);
schedstat_inc(rq->sched_goidle);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index c82857e2e288..7a3355f61bcf 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1069,6 +1069,7 @@ static inline void update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
#else
static inline void update_idle_core(struct rq *rq) { }
#endif
+void update_idle_cpumask(struct rq *rq);
DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 9079d865a935..f14a6ef4de57 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1407,6 +1407,7 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
sd->shared = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sds, sd_id);
atomic_inc(&sd->shared->ref);
atomic_set(&sd->shared->nr_busy_cpus, sd_weight);
+ cpumask_copy(sds_idle_cpus(sd->shared), sched_domain_span(sd));
}
sd->private = sdd;
@@ -1769,7 +1770,7 @@ static int __sdt_alloc(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)
*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j) = sd;
- sds = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct sched_domain_shared),
+ sds = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct sched_domain_shared) + cpumask_size(),
GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(j));
if (!sds)
return -ENOMEM;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 4:31 [RFC PATCH v2] sched/fair: select idle cpu from idle cpumask in sched domain Aubrey Li
2020-09-16 11:00 ` Mel Gorman
2020-09-16 11:40 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-09-16 12:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-09-17 9:21 ` Li, Aubrey [this message]
2020-09-21 15:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-09-21 15:21 ` Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <af0237e0-1451-9d11-2ee2-1468a8bb6180@linux.intel.com>
2020-09-22 7:14 ` Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <8a86b085-b445-b1c2-9b46-6346d923abf0@linux.intel.com>
2020-09-23 8:50 ` Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <eb1c4c84-e361-d5a7-d071-b0dd7310eab4@linux.intel.com>
2020-09-24 13:09 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-09-25 9:21 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-09-25 16:45 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-09-27 5:56 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-09-24 16:37 ` Tim Chen
2020-09-24 17:13 ` Phil Auld
2020-09-24 17:43 ` Tim Chen
2020-09-24 17:45 ` Phil Auld
2020-09-25 6:50 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=78d608f2-b974-e940-da32-b37777bc405a@linux.intel.com \
--to=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benbjiang@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox