From: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Cc: a.hindborg@kernel.org, alex.gaynor@gmail.com, ojeda@kernel.org,
aliceryhl@google.com, anna-maria@linutronix.de,
bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, dakr@kernel.org,
frederic@kernel.org, gary@garyguo.net, jstultz@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lossin@kernel.org,
lyude@redhat.com, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
sboyd@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, tmgross@umich.edu,
acourbot@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] rust: add udelay() function
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2025 09:44:27 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <793E15AB-D69C-49F5-823E-A57F343BA3F4@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250821035710.3692455-2-fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Hi Fujita,
> On 21 Aug 2025, at 00:57, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Add udelay() function, inserts a delay based on microseconds with busy
> waiting, in preparation for supporting read_poll_timeout_atomic().
>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
> ---
> rust/helpers/time.c | 5 +++++
> rust/kernel/time/delay.rs | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rust/helpers/time.c b/rust/helpers/time.c
> index a318e9fa4408..67a36ccc3ec4 100644
> --- a/rust/helpers/time.c
> +++ b/rust/helpers/time.c
> @@ -33,3 +33,8 @@ s64 rust_helper_ktime_to_ms(const ktime_t kt)
> {
> return ktime_to_ms(kt);
> }
> +
> +void rust_helper_udelay(unsigned long usec)
> +{
> + udelay(usec);
> +}
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/time/delay.rs b/rust/kernel/time/delay.rs
> index eb8838da62bc..baae3238d419 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/time/delay.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/time/delay.rs
> @@ -47,3 +47,37 @@ pub fn fsleep(delta: Delta) {
> bindings::fsleep(delta.as_micros_ceil() as c_ulong)
> }
> }
> +
> +/// Inserts a delay based on microseconds with busy waiting.
> +///
> +/// Equivalent to the C side [`udelay()`], which delays in microseconds.
> +///
> +/// `delta` must be within `[0, `MAX_UDELAY_MS`]` in milliseconds;
> +/// otherwise, it is erroneous behavior. That is, it is considered a bug to
> +/// call this function with an out-of-range value, in which case the function
> +/// will insert a delay for at least the maximum value in the range and
> +/// may warn in the future.
> +///
> +/// The behavior above differs from the C side [`udelay()`] for which out-of-range
> +/// values could lead to an overflow and unexpected behavior.
> +///
> +/// [`udelay()`]: https://docs.kernel.org/timers/delay_sleep_functions.html#c.udelay
> +pub fn udelay(delta: Delta) {
> + const MAX_UDELAY_DELTA: Delta = Delta::from_millis(bindings::MAX_UDELAY_MS as i64);
We should perhaps add a build_assert here to make sure this cast is always valid?
> +
> + let delta = if (Delta::ZERO..=MAX_UDELAY_DELTA).contains(&delta) {
> + delta
> + } else {
> + // TODO: Add WARN_ONCE() when it's supported.
> + MAX_UDELAY_DELTA
> + };
> +
> + // SAFETY: It is always safe to call `udelay()` with any duration.
> + unsafe {
> + // Convert the duration to microseconds and round up to preserve
> + // the guarantee; `udelay()` inserts a delay for at least
> + // the provided duration, but that it may delay for longer
> + // under some circumstances.
> + bindings::udelay(delta.as_micros_ceil() as c_ulong)
> + }
> +}
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
With the change you suggested for the safety comment in udelay:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@collabora.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-26 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 3:57 [PATCH v1 0/2] Add read_poll_timeout_atomic support FUJITA Tomonori
2025-08-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] rust: add udelay() function FUJITA Tomonori
2025-08-26 9:09 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-08-26 11:59 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2025-08-26 18:03 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-08-27 7:12 ` Andreas Hindborg
2025-08-26 12:44 ` Daniel Almeida [this message]
2025-08-27 2:43 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2025-08-21 3:57 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] rust: Add read_poll_timeout_atomic function FUJITA Tomonori
2025-08-26 14:02 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-27 0:35 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2025-08-27 4:32 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2025-08-26 14:12 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-08-26 16:59 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-26 17:15 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-08-27 0:14 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2025-08-27 9:00 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-08-27 10:29 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-08-27 12:14 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-27 12:19 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-08-27 12:22 ` Daniel Almeida
2025-08-27 12:36 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=793E15AB-D69C-49F5-823E-A57F343BA3F4@collabora.com \
--to=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).