From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (mailout.nod.at [116.203.167.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6FB1A9F96 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 19:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.167.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762543400; cv=none; b=dd2JxbbJiyQlCBMTIUPznBkh7vP1zXG47Ir/ZwMVvR+y9sfFU1p2sOzLOf3ZIp9IczJYQet1u9O6U3z5w/pyEO6QfzN5NamG9uhp+/UHthxuofam+YrW8J+pf2IcVp4th1n0YxOzKBPqoz7/IfA3LDEtgqexw2tb5t0YrnWtZ9Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762543400; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eXlCXSwjIH2VjjXEkoOn5qykH1tJrGt4S2/7SveqtKQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jW5wWW6zSUkS10GvR0G8x06ESLMavtKpIvWqdVXPc/TG9dfpiVFkti43LwRZW4EYRbaOAPgMJNvZ+Mb+zO5iZ182t1Yau3iBbgJX1iTaBEY8NGkRqdPP1fX2ajD4mg2DdIgMok8t6G2HDJNRmliTTBuLp4eMsrzl6ZnTJFJiGMQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nod.at; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.167.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=nod.at Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=nod.at Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA862CFC9B; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 20:23:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 2R6fOeHHtymO; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 20:23:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813442CFC87; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 20:23:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lithops.sigma-star.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id zqOd4E8HCNTp; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 20:23:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at (lithops.sigma-star.at [195.201.40.130]) by lithops.sigma-star.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A11611C056; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 20:23:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 20:23:14 +0100 (CET) From: Richard Weinberger To: Markus Elfring Cc: linux-mtd , linux-arm-kernel , linux-stm32 , linux-kernel , alexandre torgue , mcoquelin stm32 , Miquel Raynal , Vignesh Raghavendra , wanqian10@huawei.com, Yang Liu , chengzhihao1 , Liyuan Pang Message-ID: <79797154.158914.1762543394141.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> In-Reply-To: <14f5091f-b647-40c9-9c32-6a705c2d6c37@web.de> References: <20251107100057.1091153-1-pangliyuan1@huawei.com> <7857ab09-7808-4abe-9df1-66235291436b@web.de> <14f5091f-b647-40c9-9c32-6a705c2d6c37@web.de> Subject: Re: [v2] ubi: fastmap: fix ubi->fm memory leak Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.12_GA_3807 (ZimbraWebClient - FF143 (Linux)/8.8.12_GA_3809) Thread-Topic: fastmap: fix ubi->fm memory leak Thread-Index: fBqM9AqfBycgbGob73i+cfkQqy6K6g== ----- Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mail ----- > Von: "Markus Elfring" >> > You may occasionally put more than 60 characters into text lines >> > of such a change description. >> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tre= e/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=3Dv6.18-rc4#n658 >=20 >> Feel free to ignore everything Markus says. >=20 > Does your feedback indicate then also that Linux development process > documentation may be overlooked any more? The only reason why you are not on my kill file is that I can protect newbi= es from you. To quote GregKH[0]: > Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless > review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing > list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not > bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and > features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. > Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to > follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by > almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of > behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and > inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails > from them. Thanks, //richard [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2025110516-cubical-drowsily-7acd@gregkh/