linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, tj@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com,
	song@kernel.org, neil@brown.name, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	hch@infradead.org, colyli@kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
	tieren@fnnas.com
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
	johnny.chenyi@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 04/10] md/raid10: convert read/write to use bio_submit_split_bioset()
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 09:48:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <79a8e41e-c228-44e9-8286-1b2d7b3687a4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250828065733.556341-5-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>

On 8/28/25 15:57, Yu Kuai wrote:
> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> 
> On the one hand unify bio split code, prepare to fix disordered split
> IO; On the other hand fix missing blkcg_bio_issue_init() and
> trace_block_split() for split IO.
> 
> Noted discard is not handled, because discard is only splited for

s/splited/split

> unaligned head and tail, and this can be considered slow path, the
> disorder here does not matter much.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/md/raid10.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  drivers/md/raid10.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index b60c30bfb6c7..0e7d2a67fca6 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -322,10 +322,12 @@ static void raid_end_bio_io(struct r10bio *r10_bio)
>  	struct bio *bio = r10_bio->master_bio;
>  	struct r10conf *conf = r10_bio->mddev->private;
>  
> -	if (!test_bit(R10BIO_Uptodate, &r10_bio->state))
> -		bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> +	if (!test_and_set_bit(R10BIO_Returned, &r10_bio->state)) {
> +		if (!test_bit(R10BIO_Uptodate, &r10_bio->state))
> +			bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> +		bio_endio(bio);
> +	}

This change / the R10BIO_Returned flag is not mentioned in the commit message.
Please explain why it is needed to add for switching to using
bio_submit_split_bioset(), which in itself should not introduce functional
changes. Looks like this needs to be split into different patches...


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-30  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-28  6:57 [PATCH RFC v2 00/10] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-08-28  6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 01/10] block: factor out a helper bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-08-30  0:37   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30  4:03     ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-28  6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 02/10] md/raid0: convert raid0_handle_discard() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai
2025-08-30  0:41   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30  4:10     ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-30  4:38       ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28  6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 03/10] md/raid1: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30  0:43   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28  6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 04/10] md/raid10: convert read/write " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30  0:48   ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-08-30  4:18     ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-28  6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 05/10] md/raid5: convert " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30  0:50   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28  6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 06/10] md/md-linear: " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30  0:51   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28  6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 07/10] blk-crypto: " Yu Kuai
2025-08-30  0:55   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28  6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 08/10] block: skip unnecessary checks for split bio Yu Kuai
2025-08-30  0:58   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30  4:22     ` Yu Kuai
2025-08-28  6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 09/10] block: fix disordered IO in the case recursive split Yu Kuai
2025-08-30  1:02   ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-30  4:28     ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01  2:40       ` Yu Kuai
2025-09-01  6:51         ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-28  6:57 ` [PATCH RFC v2 10/10] md/raid0: convert raid0_make_request() to use bio_submit_split_bioset() Yu Kuai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=79a8e41e-c228-44e9-8286-1b2d7b3687a4@kernel.org \
    --to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=colyli@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=johnny.chenyi@huawei.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tieren@fnnas.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai1@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).