From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pdurrant@amazon.com, sj38.park@gmail.com,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] xen/blkback: Squeeze page pools if a memory pressure
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 11:29:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a1dfa22-1108-602f-68ff-ed30a18c1d3d@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191209102347.17337-1-sjpark@amazon.com>
On 09.12.19 11:23, SeongJae Park wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:39:02 +0100 Juergen <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>
>> On 09.12.19 09:58, SeongJae Park wrote:
>>> Each `blkif` has a free pages pool for the grant mapping. The size of
>>> the pool starts from zero and be increased on demand while processing
>>> the I/O requests. If current I/O requests handling is finished or 100
>>> milliseconds has passed since last I/O requests handling, it checks and
>>> shrinks the pool to not exceed the size limit, `max_buffer_pages`.
>>>
>>> Therefore, `blkfront` running guests can cause a memory pressure in the
>>> `blkback` running guest by attaching a large number of block devices and
>>> inducing I/O.
>>
>> I'm having problems to understand how a guest can attach a large number
>> of block devices without those having been configured by the host admin
>> before.
>>
>> If those devices have been configured, dom0 should be ready for that
>> number of devices, e.g. by having enough spare memory area for ballooned
>> pages.
>
> As mentioned in the original message as below, administrators _can_ avoid this
> problem, but finding the optimal configuration is hard, especially if the
> number of the guests is large.
>
> System administrators can avoid such problematic situations by limiting
> the maximum number of devices each guest can attach. However, finding
> the optimal limit is not so easy. Improper set of the limit can
> results in the memory pressure or a resource underutilization.
This sounds as if the admin would set a device limit. But it is the
other way round: The admin needs to configure each possible device
with all parameters (e.g. backing dom0 resource) for enabling the
frontend to use it.
Juergen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-09 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-09 8:58 [PATCH v3 0/1] xen/blkback: Squeeze page pools if a memory pressure SeongJae Park
2019-12-09 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] xen/blkback: Squeeze page pools if a memory pressure is detected SeongJae Park
2019-12-09 9:39 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] xen/blkback: Squeeze page pools if a memory pressure Jürgen Groß
2019-12-09 9:46 ` Durrant, Paul
2019-12-09 10:15 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-12-09 10:52 ` SeongJae Park
2019-12-09 11:08 ` Jürgen Groß
2019-12-09 11:32 ` SeongJae Park
2019-12-09 10:23 ` SeongJae Park
2019-12-09 10:29 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a1dfa22-1108-602f-68ff-ed30a18c1d3d@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pdurrant@amazon.com \
--cc=sj38.park@gmail.com \
--cc=sjpark@amazon.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox