From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89CD9218AAF for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 09:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748424934; cv=none; b=pa1Q4V1gHj2snj3MF+PlE/raAUEHEMIGe3IBTnRtLclDkhGttyWuKZnIamAso65bunIN2Z+PjpN4eMYiRVy3icdBEhvX8wzAhyWHUOFo1WjncFowzyFcDvypl2iZbyrJ/8CcK3TxqpyqL9F2dxkerfenvZqm1qDOXlHj58ywKEA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748424934; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Tc3OsSurpH1z0gI4HzRiSDSFs/zdI+P7OXdjEkrhJJA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dMYqNedUQALgdBUGd/6c2dD9UriU9FEf+eb1tIpcM3lnbfkLo76pOT/H2YFwW3O0CYiNJeYH2miwldPEIUrvl0xXFkbULi5LtPiVHCT68Ht0uSmcmfVVifTOLpt60DYP+hPRx7hC8bbf3wnhLfbZpAxsVxYuBsr9XkON592l2cE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=Gu3XtXWI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Gu3XtXWI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1748424933; x=1779960933; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=Tc3OsSurpH1z0gI4HzRiSDSFs/zdI+P7OXdjEkrhJJA=; b=Gu3XtXWIpAFG3hExvEFL/0gRBXZmaTVKjGLiYQ0n4NF1Q32i69sp7kOd lGo4YihAxeRqV6jq1Apet3EhYqJQwbZwXR16g+w8U0fiB+GSEP08nCcN4 JC+XcmY+RpIJqZdIbZLzCgQKNXuC/85wgx9tSG4eYxw07fzPiqEAEa0pI Cm00P4xwsN+7JpWyWIfLv+JohBHn38tfxF3d5GOMMAQXiwGB0wNf19NBy CWXfgaCc/P+iNEDi6GC4FYw3eDNgIzPcxEdPaGBpDmQoQen7ZJD649jH0 TiWHxg4eJMxpDlHRa+ZKKSQmTlVK7qzrk3zqlupS7LzY0vZCFuOCD03fR g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: bU+MPCFeQDmcSxS5STOCqA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: lPSWGLfGQ2OlqVggzk4IhA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11446"; a="72976082" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,320,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="72976082" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 May 2025 02:35:32 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XS4TX1aOSFq76kElmSZ4pg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: WiBiIuMNRiyKaiuvGN+x1Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,320,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="180423109" Received: from smoticic-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.23]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 May 2025 02:35:30 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Dave Airlie , Linus Torvalds , Simona Vetter Cc: dri-devel , LKML Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 6.16-rc1 In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 12:35:27 +0300 Message-ID: <7aff9a7076ada15146d4fe60d2c6cd9d99370385@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 28 May 2025, Dave Airlie wrote: > The disgusting turds removal patchset is also in here. I don't think it is. At least I didn't merge it. The existing thing just still depends on BROKEN. I had a few attempts at fixing it, Linus was okay with the patches, Masahiro was not, and that was that. I don't think it's possible to meet Linus' requirements of genericity without touching kbuild makefiles, and Masahiro apparently doesn't want it in kbuild. I still think what we want to do is reasonable. I'm not looking to impose any header checks on anyone outside of drm, and not even on all of drm. But I can't hide it inside drm makefiles. I don't know where to go from here. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel