* [PATCH] net/core: Replace offensive comment in skbuff.c
@ 2025-08-28 8:42 mysteryli
2025-08-28 12:36 ` Andrew Lunn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: mysteryli @ 2025-08-28 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: Simon Horman, Willem de Bruijn, Mina Almasry, Jason Xing,
Michal Luczaj, Alexander Lobakin, Eric Biggers, netdev,
linux-kernel, “mystery”
From: “mystery” <929916200@qq.com>
The original comment contained profanity to express the frustration of
dealing with a complex and resource-constrained code path. While the
sentiment is understandable, the language is unprofessional and
unnecessary.
Replace it with a more neutral and descriptive comment that maintains
the original technical context and conveys the difficulty of the
situation without the use of offensive language.
Signed-off-by: “mystery” <929916200@qq.com>
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index ee0274417948..202c25a01f22 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -5333,7 +5333,7 @@ int skb_cow_data(struct sk_buff *skb, int tailbits, struct sk_buff **trailer)
skb_has_frag_list(skb1)) {
struct sk_buff *skb2;
- /* Fuck, we are miserable poor guys... */
+ /* This is a painfully difficult situation with limited resources... */
if (ntail == 0)
skb2 = skb_copy(skb1, GFP_ATOMIC);
else
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net/core: Replace offensive comment in skbuff.c
2025-08-28 8:42 [PATCH] net/core: Replace offensive comment in skbuff.c mysteryli
@ 2025-08-28 12:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-08-28 15:23 ` Alexander Lobakin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2025-08-28 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mysteryli
Cc: David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni,
Simon Horman, Willem de Bruijn, Mina Almasry, Jason Xing,
Michal Luczaj, Alexander Lobakin, Eric Biggers, netdev,
linux-kernel, “mystery”
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 04:42:53PM +0800, mysteryli wrote:
> From: “mystery” <929916200@qq.com>
>
> The original comment contained profanity to express the frustration of
> dealing with a complex and resource-constrained code path. While the
> sentiment is understandable, the language is unprofessional and
> unnecessary.
> Replace it with a more neutral and descriptive comment that maintains
> the original technical context and conveys the difficulty of the
> situation without the use of offensive language.
>
> Signed-off-by: “mystery” <929916200@qq.com>
Sorry, but this signed-off is not valid:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html
says:
Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
using a known identity (sorry, no anonymous contributions.)
Please resubmit using a real identity. Please also take a read of:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
Andrew
---
pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] net/core: Replace offensive comment in skbuff.c
2025-08-28 12:36 ` Andrew Lunn
@ 2025-08-28 15:23 ` Alexander Lobakin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Lobakin @ 2025-08-28 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Lunn
Cc: mysteryli, David S . Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski,
Paolo Abeni, Simon Horman, Willem de Bruijn, Mina Almasry,
Jason Xing, Michal Luczaj, Eric Biggers, netdev, linux-kernel,
“mystery”
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:36:40 +0200
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 04:42:53PM +0800, mysteryli wrote:
>> From: “mystery” <929916200@qq.com>
>>
>> The original comment contained profanity to express the frustration of
>> dealing with a complex and resource-constrained code path. While the
>> sentiment is understandable, the language is unprofessional and
>> unnecessary.
>> Replace it with a more neutral and descriptive comment that maintains
>> the original technical context and conveys the difficulty of the
>> situation without the use of offensive language.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: “mystery” <929916200@qq.com>
>
> Sorry, but this signed-off is not valid:
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html
>
> says:
>
> Signed-off-by: Random J Developer <random@developer.example.org>
>
> using a known identity (sorry, no anonymous contributions.)
>
> Please resubmit using a real identity. Please also take a read of:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
Should we consider applying such patches at all? There are tons of such
comments, mostly in old code, while I highly doubt it may "offense" anyone.
>
>
> Andrew
Thanks,
Olek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-28 15:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-28 8:42 [PATCH] net/core: Replace offensive comment in skbuff.c mysteryli
2025-08-28 12:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-08-28 15:23 ` Alexander Lobakin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).