Re: [PATCH v3 00/32] kselftest harness and nolibc compatibility

[Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>]

On 4/22/25 02:51, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:00:24AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
>>> Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small,
>>> and compiled with just a kernel crosscompiler, without userspace support.
>>> Currently nolibc is only usable with kselftest.h, not the more
>>> convenient to use kselftest_harness.h
>>> This series provides this compatibility by adding new features to nolibc
>>> and removing the usage of problematic features from the harness.
>>>
>>> The first half of the series are changes to the harness, the second one
>>> are for nolibc. Both parts are very independent and should go through
>>> different trees.
>>
>> I need a few nolibc bits of this series (snprintf() and prep patches) to base
>> further patches on. For that I'd like to pick up all the nolibc patches from
>> this series through the nolibc tree. They got Acks from Willy.
>>
>> Any objections?
> 
> No objection on my side!
> 

Thanks.

Kees, do you have any comments on this series? If you are okay
with it, I would like to apply this for next.

thanks,
-- Shuah