From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>,
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>,
Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>,
Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>,
Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>,
Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <mkchauras@gmail.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Validate arch_compat against host compatibility mode
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:37:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bnye4ue.ritesh.list@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616163405.96962-1-amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> On IBM POWER systems, newer processor generations can operate in
> compatibility modes corresponding to earlier generations. This becomes
> relevant for nested virtualization, where nested KVM guests may need to
> run with a specific processor compatibility level.
>
> Currently, when running a nested KVM guest (L2) inside a Power11 pSeries
> logical partition (L1) booted in Power10 compatibility mode, the guest
> fails to boot while setting 'arch_compat'. This happens because the CPU
> class is derived from the hardware PVR (via mfspr()), which reflects the
> physical processor generation (Power11), rather than the effective
> compatibility mode (Power10).
>
> As a result, userspace may request a Power11 arch_compat for the L2
> guest. However, the L1 partition, running in Power10 compatibility, has
> only negotiated support up to Power10 with the Power Hypervisor (L0).
> When H_GUEST_SET_STATE is invoked with a Power11 Logical PVR, the
> hypervisor rejects the request, leading to a late guest boot failure:
>
> KVM-NESTEDv2: couldn't set guest wide elements
> [..KVM reg dump..]
>
> This situation should be detected earlier and rejected by KVM. Without
> proper validation, if userspace ignores the error, the guest may continue
> to boot in Power11 raw mode on a Power10 compatibility host, which should
> not be allowed.
>
> Introduce a validation mechanism that detects unsupported arch_compat
> values early in the guest initialization path. When an unsupported
> arch_compat is requested (e.g., Power11 on a Power10 compatibility mode
> host), kvmppc_set_arch_compat() uses cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P11_PVR) to
> detect the mismatch and sets arch_compat to PVR_ARCH_INVALID (0xffffffff).
> This sentinel value is architecturally safe: PAPR specifies that valid
> logical PVR values must have 0x0f as the first byte, ensuring 0xffffffff
> lies permanently outside the specification-defined range. Setting this
> value triggers kvmppc_sanity_check() to mark the vCPU as invalid by
> setting vcpu->arch.sane to false. On the next vCPU run, kvmppc_vcpu_run_hv()
> checks this flag and returns -EINVAL, preventing the guest from running
> with an invalid processor compatibility configuration.
>
> With this, when a Power11 arch_compat is requested on a Power10
> compatibility mode host, the guest fails early during boot with:
>
> error: kvm run failed Invalid argument
>
> This provides a much clearer failure mode compared to the previous
> behavior where the guest could boot in Power11 raw mode (if userspace
> ignored the error) or fail late during H_GUEST_SET_STATE.
>
> Suggested-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
> Tested-by: Anushree Mathur <anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Gautam Menghani <gautam@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.13+
> Signed-off-by: Amit Machhiwal <amachhiw@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> Testing: Both Anushree and I have tested the below scenarios:
> 1. P11 guest on P11 host - Works
> 2. P10 compat guest on P11 host - Works
> 3. P11 guest on compat-P10 host - Correctly fails with "Invalid argument"
> 4. P10 guest on compat-P10 host - Works
>
Thanks for incorporating all the changes and adding the test result
matrix in the changelog.
The changes looks good, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 16:34 [PATCH v4] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Validate arch_compat against host compatibility mode Amit Machhiwal
2026-06-16 18:07 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7bnye4ue.ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=amachhiw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anushree.mathur@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=gautam@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mkchauras@gmail.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vaibhav@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox