From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B648B18786C; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 23:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724456395; cv=none; b=UYV/JOcuoOFZlikm6p6CCGaQwE0IKPc1f0AT1yIv8uh4KEshjszwgqVzP7oq3wu3y2Y4OLMytkLyvWUYJZ0OV0fMEvGroM72DnHvWT3MAabrAewFeb105FWpTUay1n4joEDsWW7aju9tx9S8HWlAt6i6woKtR82hpx7wwbtlqR8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1724456395; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kKWBQ7G/gB0nDLrO048tvpph0/Er6ULD8dku7gWLG48=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=cMgtzSii2Pp5YxOhMDfN5+XPfRCqDaLndNw5ASjfXLgL+wpkGnk8eDy0TvWbS6nuejsrpTm9gpd9yxw2j8VofkvuLUeHC5RfSuYTVEJCvDhW62q6rqVYo5IJj/XwGu44JVtJsCFZXm4LfUhJWpdaCwQDGLgRnnqlQFH6oV4GPSY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=QbI/Zcmc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="QbI/Zcmc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44172C4AF0C; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 23:39:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1724456395; bh=kKWBQ7G/gB0nDLrO048tvpph0/Er6ULD8dku7gWLG48=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=QbI/ZcmcvCRcz+B/FgOEuHA152qLPLxAjuKBSXTpPgt4/nVwipMbKPsETLLQEoW/f GAZyWcO8UIDbkFLI+XZmruZnu3sbSHuupnEAY6uHoJ0y/7SZGs9JXpzawveVG7q0HS WM4B07hpusajvZSJI8w0bNCXupkaJW76SNc4f2woV+H1h9+HLDs/6F+qDvQWq8Wwof UkkTKckIRWdrMz8iFAVDoJfO+QVNibzFcBh3JOODYcWKq74oT6ez8f+1iFhUvRgM81 /FgAy2lIzL8qbuvjsL+ogle5fOicoJV6ZeCZVJGLizv162blmKtaNHFlAEu+PXF7M5 TsRMGLzXC3s/Q== Message-ID: <7c75defd-372b-42cc-897a-eb46e4a8966e@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 02:39:49 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Do not require reg for sc8180x virt NoCs To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, quic_okukatla@quicinc.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul References: <20240730141016.1142608-1-djakov@kernel.org> <31173e79-4b2d-4027-a4a2-61071206f387@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Georgi Djakov In-Reply-To: <31173e79-4b2d-4027-a4a2-61071206f387@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 30.07.24 17:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 30/07/2024 16:10, djakov@kernel.org wrote: >> From: Georgi Djakov >> >> The virtual interconnect providers do not have their own IO address space, >> but this is not documented in the DT schema and the following warnings are >> reported by dtbs_check: >> >> sc8180x-lenovo-flex-5g.dtb: interconnect-camnoc-virt: 'reg' is a required property >> sc8180x-lenovo-flex-5g.dtb: interconnect-mc-virt: 'reg' is a required property >> sc8180x-lenovo-flex-5g.dtb: interconnect-qup-virt: 'reg' is a required property >> sc8180x-primus.dtb: interconnect-camnoc-virt: 'reg' is a required property >> sc8180x-primus.dtb: interconnect-mc-virt: 'reg' is a required property >> sc8180x-primus.dtb: interconnect-qup-virt: 'reg' is a required property >> >> Fix this by adding them to the list of compatibles that do not require >> the reg property. > > So I guess we are giving up on > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530162454.51708-4-vkoul@kernel.org/ > ? Thanks for the pointer! That approach is fine too, but i was expecting a re-send and then later completely forgot about it. I have a slight preference towards my patch, because it is more compact, but i can also revive Vinod's patch if you think that it would be a better pattern to follow in the long term. BR, Georgi