From: Hao Jia <jiahao.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hanguangjiang@lixiang.com
Cc: osandov@fb.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: sched: observed instability under stress in 6.12 and mainline
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 09:51:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cd74213-5654-aac0-54d0-4f4b1a7f0fef@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87254ef1-fa58-4747-b2e1-5c85ecde15bf@windriver.com>
On 2025/9/5 00:33, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to draw the attention of the scheduler maintainers to a number
> of kernel bugzilla reports submitted by a colleague a couple of weeks ago:
>
> 6.12.18:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220447
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220448
>
> v6.16-rt3
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220450
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=220449
>
> There seems to be something wrong with either the logic or the locking.
> In one case this resulted in a NULL pointer dereference in
> pick_next_entity(). In another case it resulted in
> BUG_ON(!rq->nr_running) in dequeue_top_rt_rq() and
> SCHED_WARN_ON(!se->on_rq) in update_entity_lag().
>
> My colleague suggests that the NULL pointer dereference may be due to
> pick_eevdf() returning NULL in pick_next_entity().
>
> I did some digging and found that
> https://gitlab.com/linux-kernel/stable/-/commit/86b37810 would not have
> been included in 6.12.18, but the equivalent fix should have been in the
> 6.16 load.
>
> We haven't yet bottomed out the root cause.
>
> Any suggestions or assistance would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
>
Maybe this patch can be useful for your problem.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_3177343A3163451463643E434C61911B4208@qq.com/
If I understand correctly, we may dequeue_entity twice in
rt_mutex_setprio()/__sched_setscheduler(). cfs_bandwidth may break the
state of p->on_rq and se->on_rq.
Thanks,
Hao
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-08 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 16:33 sched: observed instability under stress in 6.12 and mainline Chris Friesen
2025-09-08 1:51 ` Hao Jia [this message]
2025-09-08 2:22 ` Hao Jia
2025-10-13 3:03 ` Jiping Ma
2025-10-13 5:54 ` Hao Jia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7cd74213-5654-aac0-54d0-4f4b1a7f0fef@gmail.com \
--to=jiahao.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
--cc=hanguangjiang@lixiang.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox