From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev, osandov@osandov.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vmcoreinfo: Track and log recoverable hardware errors
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 16:00:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ce9731a-b212-4e27-8809-0559eb36c5f2@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250722-vmcore_hw_error-v3-1-ff0683fc1f17@debian.org>
Hi, Breno,
在 2025/7/23 00:56, Breno Leitao 写道:
> Introduce a generic infrastructure for tracking recoverable hardware
> errors (HW errors that did not cause a panic) and record them for vmcore
> consumption. This aids post-mortem crash analysis tools by preserving
> a count and timestamp for the last occurrence of such errors.
>
> Add centralized logging for three common sources of recoverable hardware
> errors:
The term "recoverable" is highly ambiguous. Even within the x86
architecture, different vendors define errors differently. I'm not
trying to be pedantic about classification. As far as I know, for 2-bit
memory errors detected by scrub, AMD defines them as deferred errors
(DE) and handles them with log_error_deferred, while Intel uses
machine_check_poll. For 2-bit memory errors consumed by processes, both
Intel and AMD use MCE handling viado_machine_check(). Does your
HWERR_RECOV_MCE only focus on synchronous UE errors handled in
do_machine_check? What makes it special?
>
> - PCIe AER Correctable errors
> - x86 Machine Check Exceptions (MCE)
> - APEI/CPER GHES corrected or recoverable errors
>
> hwerror_data is write-only at kernel runtime, and it is meant to be
> read from vmcore using tools like crash/drgn. For example, this is how
> it looks like when opening the crashdump from drgn.
>
> >>> prog['hwerror_data']
> (struct hwerror_info[3]){
> {
> .count = (int)844,
> .timestamp = (time64_t)1752852018,
> },
> ...
>
> This helps fleet operators quickly triage whether a crash may be
> influenced by hardware recoverable errors (which executes a uncommon
> code path in the kernel), especially when recoverable errors occurred
> shortly before a panic, such as the bug fixed by
> commit ee62ce7a1d90 ("page_pool: Track DMA-mapped pages and unmap them
> when destroying the pool")
>
> This is not intended to replace full hardware diagnostics but provides
> a fast way to correlate hardware events with kernel panics quickly.
>
> Suggested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Add more information about this feature in the commit message
> (Borislav Petkov)
> - Renamed the function to hwerr_log_error_type() and use hwerr as
> suffix (Borislav Petkov)
> - Make the empty function static inline (kernel test robot)
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250721-vmcore_hw_error-v2-1-ab65a6b43c5a@debian.org
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Split the counter by recoverable error (Tony Luck)
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250714-vmcore_hw_error-v1-1-8cf45edb6334@debian.org
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 3 +++
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 8 ++++++--
> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 2 ++
> include/linux/vmcore_info.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> kernel/vmcore_info.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> index 4da4eab56c81d..cb225a42eebbb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #include <linux/task_work.h>
> #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> #include <linux/kexec.h>
> +#include <linux/vmcore_info.h>
>
> #include <asm/fred.h>
> #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> @@ -1692,6 +1693,8 @@ noinstr void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs)
> out:
> instrumentation_end();
>
> + /* Given it didn't panic, mark it as recoverable */
> + hwerr_log_error_type(HWERR_RECOV_MCE);
> clear:
> mce_wrmsrq(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index a0d54993edb3b..ebda2aa3d68f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> #include <linux/uuid.h>
> #include <linux/ras.h>
> #include <linux/task_work.h>
> +#include <linux/vmcore_info.h>
>
> #include <acpi/actbl1.h>
> #include <acpi/ghes.h>
> @@ -1136,13 +1137,16 @@ static int ghes_proc(struct ghes *ghes)
> {
> struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus = ghes->estatus;
> u64 buf_paddr;
> - int rc;
> + int rc, sev;
>
> rc = ghes_read_estatus(ghes, estatus, &buf_paddr, FIX_APEI_GHES_IRQ);
> if (rc)
> goto out;
>
> - if (ghes_severity(estatus->error_severity) >= GHES_SEV_PANIC)
> + sev = ghes_severity(estatus->error_severity);
> + if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE || sev == GHES_SEV_CORRECTED)
> + hwerr_log_error_type(HWERR_RECOV_GHES);
APEI does not define an error type named GHES. GHES is just a kernel
driver name. Many hardware error types can be handled in GHES (see
ghes_do_proc), for example, AER is routed by GHES when firmware-first
mode is used. As far as I know, firmware-first mode is commonly used in
production. Should GHES errors be categorized into AER, memory, and CXL
memory instead?
Thanks.
Shuai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-24 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-22 16:56 [PATCH v3] vmcoreinfo: Track and log recoverable hardware errors Breno Leitao
2025-07-23 14:28 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-23 15:36 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-23 19:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-07-23 23:21 ` Huang, Kai
2025-07-24 8:00 ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2025-07-24 13:34 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-25 7:40 ` Shuai Xue
2025-07-25 16:16 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-28 1:08 ` Shuai Xue
2025-07-29 13:48 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-30 2:13 ` Shuai Xue
2025-07-30 13:11 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-30 13:50 ` Shuai Xue
2025-07-30 17:16 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-30 16:21 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2025-07-30 17:22 ` Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ce9731a-b212-4e27-8809-0559eb36c5f2@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).