From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755980AbcJTVZn (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:25:43 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:33979 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752733AbcJTVZj (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:25:39 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org BA18761822 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=okaya@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <1476505867-24599-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1476505867-24599-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20161018135912.GD18903@localhost> <0a82f2ef-b072-d847-104a-320cf804ebd5@codeaurora.org> <20161019224405.GA14915@localhost> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , ACPI Devel Maling List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Bjorn Helgaas , ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com, Ondrej Zary , Timur Tabi , Christopher Covington , Jon Masters , Alex Williamson , Linux PCI , Andy Gross , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, wim@djo.tudelft.nl, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Len Brown From: Sinan Kaya Message-ID: <7d6c7dc6-4ae5-537e-9137-ee80a76fc9bd@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:25:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/20/2016 2:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: >> On 10/19/2016 3:44 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [cut] > >> If we want to move the ISA pieces out of this file, that can be done too. >> We can also add support for PNPACPI. I'm not a very big fan of scratch >> everything and start from beginning approach. This refactoring effort already >> failed 3 times. I'd like to close the issue and move on. > > Understood, but we have broken this for too many times already. > > Either we have a minimum fix that is known working or we are going back. Agreed. I think my V4 patch satisfies our short term goals and fixes the issue you are seeing. IMO, it is good enough for the moment. > > Thanks, > Rafael > -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.