From: Stefan Strogin <sstrogin@cisco.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: zbr@ioremap.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xe-linux-external@cisco.com,
jderehag@hotmail.com, matt.helsley@gmail.com,
minipli@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] connector: add parent pid and tgid to coredump and exit events
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 18:18:42 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d976488-6375-b3a8-e9d7-dc86b4c51b86@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180330.125921.653839794312978457.davem@davemloft.net>
Hi David,
I don't see how it breaks UAPI. The point is that structures
coredump_proc_event and exit_proc_event are members of *union*
event_data, thus position of the existing data in the structure is
unchanged. Furthermore, this change won't increase size of struct
proc_event, because comm_proc_event (also a member of event_data) is
of bigger size than the changed structures.
If I'm wrong, could you please explain what exactly will the change
break in UAPI?
On 30/03/18 19:59, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stefan Strogin <sstrogin@cisco.com>
> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2018 17:12:47 +0300
>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h b/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h
>> index 68ff25414700..db210625cee8 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/cn_proc.h
>> @@ -116,12 +116,16 @@ struct proc_event {
>> struct coredump_proc_event {
>> __kernel_pid_t process_pid;
>> __kernel_pid_t process_tgid;
>> + __kernel_pid_t parent_pid;
>> + __kernel_pid_t parent_tgid;
>> } coredump;
>>
>> struct exit_proc_event {
>> __kernel_pid_t process_pid;
>> __kernel_pid_t process_tgid;
>> __u32 exit_code, exit_signal;
>> + __kernel_pid_t parent_pid;
>> + __kernel_pid_t parent_tgid;
>> } exit;
>>
>> } event_data;
>
> I don't think you can add these members without breaking UAPI.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-02 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-29 14:12 [PATCH] connector: add parent pid and tgid to coredump and exit events Stefan Strogin
2018-03-30 16:59 ` David Miller
2018-04-02 15:18 ` Stefan Strogin [this message]
[not found] ` <DB6P190MB0389513E240BD8ECEE575DB4DDBB0@DB6P190MB0389.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
2018-04-26 12:04 ` Stefan Strogin
2018-04-30 15:01 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2018-04-30 15:17 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d976488-6375-b3a8-e9d7-dc86b4c51b86@cisco.com \
--to=sstrogin@cisco.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jderehag@hotmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.helsley@gmail.com \
--cc=minipli@googlemail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xe-linux-external@cisco.com \
--cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox