From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/11] iommu: Add pasid_bits field in struct dev_iommu
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 18:22:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7de05f5e-864f-175e-5604-29561d330884@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL1PR11MB527130BAAC3B4F48E4901F5D8C169@BL1PR11MB5271.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 2022/3/21 15:01, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 2:40 PM
>>
>> Use this field to save the pasid/ssid bits that a device is able to
>> support with its IOMMU hardware. It is a generic attribute of a device
>> and lifting it into the per-device dev_iommu struct makes it possible
>> to allocate a PASID for device without calls into the IOMMU drivers.
>> Any iommu driver which suports PASID related features should set this
>> field before features are enabled on the devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/iommu.h | 1 +
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 1 +
>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 5 ++++-
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
>> index 6ef2df258673..36f43af0af53 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
>> @@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ struct dev_iommu {
>> struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec;
>> struct iommu_device *iommu_dev;
>> void *priv;
>> + unsigned int pasid_bits;
>> };
>>
>> int iommu_device_register(struct iommu_device *iommu,
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> index 627a3ed5ee8f..8e262210b5ad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
>> @@ -2812,6 +2812,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_dev_enable_feature(struct
>> device *dev,
>> master->iopf_enabled = true;
>> return 0;
>> case IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_SVA:
>> + dev->iommu->pasid_bits = master->ssid_bits;
>> return arm_smmu_master_enable_sva(master);
>> default:
>> return -EINVAL;
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> index 6f7485c44a4b..c1b91bce1530 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>> @@ -4587,8 +4587,11 @@ static struct iommu_device
>> *intel_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
>> if (pasid_supported(iommu)) {
>> int features = pci_pasid_features(pdev);
>>
>> - if (features >= 0)
>> + if (features >= 0) {
>> info->pasid_supported = features | 1;
>> + dev->iommu->pasid_bits =
>> + fls(pci_max_pasids(pdev)) - 1;
> Original intel_svm_alloc_pasid() covers both PCI and non-PCI devices:
>
> ioasid_t max_pasid = dev_is_pci(dev) ?
> pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)) : intel_pasid_max_id;
>
> though I'm not sure whether non-PCI SVA has been supported indeed, this
> patch implies a functional change here.
>
The info->pasid_supported is only set for PCI devices. So the status is
that non-PCI SVA hasn't been supported. No functional change here from
this point of view.
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-21 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-20 6:40 [PATCH RFC 00/11] iommu: SVA and IOPF refactoring Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 01/11] iommu: Add pasid_bits field in struct dev_iommu Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 7:01 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 10:22 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2022-03-22 0:26 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-22 0:48 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:22 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 0:45 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 02/11] iommu: Add iommu_domain type for SVA Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 7:06 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 10:23 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 0:54 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 03/11] iommu: Add attach/detach_dev_pasid domain ops Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 7:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 10:27 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 04/11] iommu/vt-d: Add SVA domain support Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 7:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 10:37 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 4:25 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 05/11] arm-smmu-v3/sva: " Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:31 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 11:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 06/11] iommu/sva: Use attach/detach_pasid_dev in SVA interfaces Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 8:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 11:01 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 12:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-21 11:33 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 4:29 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 12:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 4:31 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 07/11] iommu: Remove SVA related callbacks from iommu ops Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 08/11] iommu: Handle IO page faults directly Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 11:35 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 0:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 09/11] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid() Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 12:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 4:50 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 10/11] iommu: Make IOPF handling framework generic Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 8:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-21 11:42 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 12:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 5:03 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-22 10:02 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 12:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 1:00 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-22 10:06 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 10:24 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-03-22 10:50 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-21 11:39 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
2022-03-22 5:28 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-21 12:50 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-22 5:48 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-20 6:40 ` [PATCH RFC 11/11] iommu: Rename iommu-sva-lib.{c,h} Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7de05f5e-864f-175e-5604-29561d330884@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox