From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Kai Aizen <kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com>, jgg@nvidia.com
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
nicolinc@nvidia.com, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com,
joro@8bytes.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommufd: Use sizeof(*hdr) instead of sizeof(hdr) in veventq read
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 11:26:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e085616-ec18-49a0-9414-d3a2302b2c72@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430175630.67078-1-kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com>
On 5/1/2026 1:56 AM, Kai Aizen wrote:
> The bound-check in iommufd_veventq_fops_read() for the normal vEVENT
> path uses sizeof(hdr) where the surrounding code uses sizeof(*hdr):
>
> if (!vevent_for_lost_events_header(cur) &&
> sizeof(hdr) + cur->data_len > count - done) {
>
> hdr is declared as struct iommufd_vevent_header *, so sizeof(hdr)
> evaluates to the size of the pointer. Surrounding code uses
> sizeof(*hdr) consistently:
>
> if (done >= count || sizeof(*hdr) > count - done) {
> ...
> if (copy_to_user(buf + done, hdr, sizeof(*hdr))) {
> ...
> done += sizeof(*hdr);
>
> struct iommufd_vevent_header is currently 8 bytes (two __u32 fields,
> flags and sequence), so on 64-bit (sizeof(void *) == 8) the two
> expressions happen to be equal and the check works as intended.
>
> On 32-bit (sizeof(void *) == 4) the check under-counts the header by
> 4 bytes: a vEVENT whose data_len causes 8 + cur->data_len to exceed
> count - done while 4 + cur->data_len does not will pass the check,
> then the loop will copy_to_user 8 bytes of header followed by data_len
> bytes of payload, writing past the user-supplied buffer.
>
> It is also a latent bug for any future expansion of struct
> iommufd_vevent_header beyond sizeof(void *) on 64-bit; the check
> should not depend on the type happening to match the host pointer
> width.
>
> Use sizeof(*hdr) to match the rest of the function and the actual
> amount that will be copied.
>
> Fixes: e36ba5ab808e ("iommufd: Add IOMMUFD_OBJ_VEVENTQ and IOMMUFD_CMD_VEVENTQ_ALLOC")
> Cc:stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Kai Aizen<kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Aizen<kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-30 17:56 [PATCH v2] iommufd: Use sizeof(*hdr) instead of sizeof(hdr) in veventq read Kai Aizen
2026-05-05 3:26 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-05-05 3:45 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e085616-ec18-49a0-9414-d3a2302b2c72@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kai.aizen.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox