From: Basavaraj Natikar <bnatikar@amd.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
Cc: "open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nehal Shah <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Joerie de Gram <j.de.gram@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Fix wakeups when IRQ is shared with SCI
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 16:39:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e2b79c8-2c49-468b-73f6-258b22ea8945@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211019160401.8296-2-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
On 10/19/2021 9:34 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> On some Lenovo AMD Gen2 platforms the IRQ for the SCI and pinctrl drivers
> are shared. Due to how the s2idle loop handling works, this case needs
> an extra explicit check whether the interrupt was caused by SCI or by
> the GPIO controller.
>
> To fix this rework the existing IRQ handler function to function as a
> checker and an IRQ handler depending on the calling arguments.
>
> BugLink: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1738
> Reported-by: Joerie de Gram <j.de.gram@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> Note:
> This is *possibly* a fix from fdde0ff8590b, 56b991849009 or other
> changes in the acpi_s2idle_wake handling, but AMD didn't support
> s2idle across the kernel widely until 5.14 or later. This is the
> reason for lack of a fixes tag.
> Changes from v2->v3:
> * Add new precursor patch for fixing missing ACPI function stubs
> * Add __maybe_unused for unused function when set with COMPILE_TEST
> Changes from v1->v2:
> * drop Kconfig changes to drop COMPILE_TEST, instead #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> * fix a logic error during wakeup
> * Use IRQ_RETVAL()
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
> index d19974aceb2e..1272ecd8791f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-amd.c
> @@ -598,16 +598,16 @@ static struct irq_chip amd_gpio_irqchip = {
>
> #define PIN_IRQ_PENDING (BIT(INTERRUPT_STS_OFF) | BIT(WAKE_STS_OFF))
>
> -static irqreturn_t amd_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +static bool _amd_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> struct amd_gpio *gpio_dev = dev_id;
> struct gpio_chip *gc = &gpio_dev->gc;
> - irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;
> unsigned int i, irqnr;
> unsigned long flags;
> u32 __iomem *regs;
> u32 regval;
> u64 status, mask;
> + bool ret = false;
Just a minor nit. Can you do it reverse Xmas?
With that change
Acked-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>
Thanks,
Basavaraj
>
> /* Read the wake status */
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_dev->lock, flags);
> @@ -627,6 +627,12 @@ static irqreturn_t amd_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> /* Each status bit covers four pins */
> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> regval = readl(regs + i);
> + /* called from resume context on a shared IRQ, just
> + * checking wake source.
> + */
> + if (irq < 0 && (regval & BIT(WAKE_STS_OFF)))
> + return true;
> +
> if (!(regval & PIN_IRQ_PENDING) ||
> !(regval & BIT(INTERRUPT_MASK_OFF)))
> continue;
> @@ -652,9 +658,12 @@ static irqreturn_t amd_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> }
> writel(regval, regs + i);
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_dev->lock, flags);
> - ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
> + ret = true;
> }
> }
> + /* called from resume context on shared IRQ but didn't cause wake */
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return false;
>
> /* Signal EOI to the GPIO unit */
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_dev->lock, flags);
> @@ -666,6 +675,16 @@ static irqreturn_t amd_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static irqreturn_t amd_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + return IRQ_RETVAL(_amd_gpio_irq_handler(irq, dev_id));
> +}
> +
> +static bool __maybe_unused amd_gpio_check_wake(void *dev_id)
> +{
> + return _amd_gpio_irq_handler(-1, dev_id);
> +}
> +
> static int amd_get_groups_count(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
> {
> struct amd_gpio *gpio_dev = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
> @@ -1004,6 +1023,7 @@ static int amd_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto out2;
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, gpio_dev);
> + acpi_register_wakeup_handler(gpio_dev->irq, amd_gpio_check_wake, gpio_dev);
>
> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "amd gpio driver loaded\n");
> return ret;
> @@ -1021,6 +1041,7 @@ static int amd_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> gpio_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> gpiochip_remove(&gpio_dev->gc);
> + acpi_unregister_wakeup_handler(amd_gpio_check_wake, gpio_dev);
>
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-22 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-19 16:04 [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: Add stubs for wakeup handler functions Mario Limonciello
2021-10-19 16:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] pinctrl: amd: Fix wakeups when IRQ is shared with SCI Mario Limonciello
2021-10-22 11:09 ` Basavaraj Natikar [this message]
2021-10-22 11:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: Add stubs for wakeup handler functions Basavaraj Natikar
2021-10-22 12:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-10-22 20:32 ` Limonciello, Mario
2021-10-22 12:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e2b79c8-2c49-468b-73f6-258b22ea8945@amd.com \
--to=bnatikar@amd.com \
--cc=Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com \
--cc=Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com \
--cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
--cc=j.de.gram@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox