From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Alexey <sdl@nppct.ru>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen-netfront: handle NULL returned by xdp_convert_buff_to_frame()
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 15:22:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e73b2ee-45be-42d7-a1f4-9e573448051d@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff6eed52-5f1f-4070-90dc-8cf057f35e41@nppct.ru>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2350 bytes --]
On 17.04.25 13:19, Alexey wrote:
>
> On 17.04.2025 13:23, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> On 17.04.25 12:06, Alexey wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17.04.2025 11:51, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>> On 17.04.25 10:45, Alexey wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17.04.2025 10:12, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>>>>> On 17.04.25 09:00, Alexey wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 17.04.2025 03:58, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 18:34:01 +0000 Alexey Nepomnyashih wrote:
>>>>>>>>> get_page(pdata);
>>>>>>>> Please notice this get_page() here.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> xdpf = xdp_convert_buff_to_frame(xdp);
>>>>>>>>> + if (unlikely(!xdpf)) {
>>>>>>>>> + trace_xdp_exception(queue->info->netdev, prog, act);
>>>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> Do you mean that it would be better to move the get_page(pdata) call lower,
>>>>>>> after checking for NULL in xdpf, so that the reference count is only
>>>>>>> increased
>>>>>>> after a successful conversion?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the error handling here is generally broken (or at least very
>>>>>> questionable).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect that in case of at least some errors the get_page() is leaking
>>>>>> even without this new patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In case I'm wrong a comment reasoning why there is no leak should be
>>>>>> added.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Juergen
>>>>>
>>>>> I think pdata is freed in xdp_return_frame_rx_napi() -> __xdp_return()
>>>>
>>>> Agreed. But what if xennet_xdp_xmit() returns an error < 0?
>>>>
>>>> In this case xdp_return_frame_rx_napi() won't be called.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Juergen
>>>
>>> Agreed. There is no explicit freed pdata in the calling function
>>> xennet_get_responses(). Without this, the page referenced by pdata
>>> could be leaked.
>>>
>>> I suggest:
>>
>> Could you please merge the two if () blocks, as they share the
>> call of xdp_return_frame_rx_napi() now? Something like:
>>
>> if (unlikely(err <= 0)) {
>> if (err < 0)
>> trace_xdp_exception(queue->info->netdev, prog, act);
>> xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
>> }
>>
>> Juergen
>>
>> P.S.: please don't use HTML in emails
>
> I can't do this because xennet_xdp_xmit() can return a value > 0
Yes, this is what the "if (unlikely(err <= 0))" is for.
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-14 18:34 [PATCH] xen-netfront: handle NULL returned by xdp_convert_buff_to_frame() Alexey Nepomnyashih
2025-04-17 0:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-17 7:00 ` Alexey
2025-04-17 7:12 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-04-17 8:45 ` Alexey
2025-04-17 8:51 ` Juergen Gross
[not found] ` <8264519a-d58a-486e-b3c5-dba400658513@nppct.ru>
2025-04-17 10:23 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-04-17 11:19 ` Alexey
2025-04-17 13:22 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e73b2ee-45be-42d7-a1f4-9e573448051d@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdl@nppct.ru \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox