From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, "Jörg Rödel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DMAR-IR: IRQ remapping was enabled on dmar6 but we are not in kdump mode
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 10:13:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7eb01b85-9233-4f21-865e-6d128f39fb46@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <61ce93c7-e89c-4217-8095-dde9fb01763c@molgen.mpg.de>
On 5/15/24 3:46 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am 23.01.24 um 01:55 schrieb Baolu Lu:
>> On 2024/1/22 22:53, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>> Am 22.01.24 um 13:38 schrieb Baolu Lu:
>>>> On 2024/1/19 22:45, Paul Menzel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On a Dell PowerEdge T640, Linux 5.9 and 6.6.12 warn about kdump:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 2.728445] DMAR-IR: IRQ remapping was enabled on dmar6 but
>>>>> we are not in kdump mode
>>>>> [ 2.736544] DMAR-IR: IRQ remapping was enabled on dmar5 but
>>>>> we are not in kdump mode
>>>>> [ 2.744620] DMAR-IR: IRQ remapping was enabled on dmar4 but
>>>>> we are not in kdump mode
>>>>> [ 2.752695] DMAR-IR: IRQ remapping was enabled on dmar3 but
>>>>> we are not in kdump mode
>>>>> [ 2.760774] DMAR-IR: IRQ remapping was enabled on dmar2 but
>>>>> we are not in kdump mode
>>>>> [ 2.768847] DMAR-IR: IRQ remapping was enabled on dmar1 but
>>>>> we are not in kdump mode
>>>>> [ 2.776922] DMAR-IR: IRQ remapping was enabled on dmar0 but
>>>>> we are not in kdump mode
>>>>> [ 2.784999] DMAR-IR: IRQ remapping was enabled on dmar7 but
>>>>> we are not in kdump mode
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking through the logs, this only happens when using kexec to
>>>>> restart the system.
>>>>
>>>> The code that warned this is,
>>>>
>>>> 599 if (ir_pre_enabled(iommu)) {
>>>> 600 if (!is_kdump_kernel()) {
>>>> 601 pr_warn("IRQ remapping was enabled on
>>>> %s but we are not in kdump mode\n",
>>>> 602 iommu->name);
>>>> 603 clear_ir_pre_enabled(iommu);
>>>> 604 iommu_disable_irq_remapping(iommu);
>>>> 605 }
>>>>
>>>> The VT-d interrupt remapping is enabled during boot, but this is not a
>>>> kdump kernel.
>>>>
>>>> Do you mind checking whether the disable interrupt remapping callback
>>>> was called during kexec reboot?
>>>>
>>>> 1121 struct irq_remap_ops intel_irq_remap_ops = {
>>>> 1122 .prepare = intel_prepare_irq_remapping,
>>>> 1123 .enable = intel_enable_irq_remapping,
>>>> 1124 .disable = disable_irq_remapping,
>>>> 1125 .reenable = reenable_irq_remapping,
>>>> 1126 .enable_faulting = enable_drhd_fault_handling,
>>>> 1127 };
>>>
>>> Is there a way to check this without rebuilding the Linux kernel?
>>
>> I am not sure, but you can check whether any messages are dumped in the
>> path of .disable callback? or try to use ftrace?
>
> With
>
> ```
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
> b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
> index 712ebfc9870c6..146f19ae5b5f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
> @@ -1030,6 +1030,7 @@ static void disable_irq_remapping(void)
> struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
> struct intel_iommu *iommu = NULL;
>
> + pr_warn("XXX: Called %s\n", __func__);
> /*
> * Disable Interrupt-remapping for all the DRHD's now.
> */
> ```
>
> I can’t see anything in the logs, so it does not seem to be called.
>
> Can you reproduce the issue?
How did you reproduce this?
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-15 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-19 14:45 DMAR-IR: IRQ remapping was enabled on dmar6 but we are not in kdump mode Paul Menzel
2024-01-19 15:11 ` Jörg Rödel
2024-01-22 12:38 ` Baolu Lu
2024-01-22 14:53 ` Paul Menzel
2024-01-23 0:55 ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-14 19:46 ` Paul Menzel
2024-05-15 2:13 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2024-05-15 6:02 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-08 11:07 ` Paul Menzel
2024-06-09 7:30 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7eb01b85-9233-4f21-865e-6d128f39fb46@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox