From: "Radu Pirea (OSS)" <radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sebastian.tobuschat@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 14/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: timestamp reading workaround for TJA1120
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:46:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7eda291f-1e2a-1af6-ae25-785b6eccc281@oss.nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230619085831.dnzg2i5mqysc6r3r@soft-dev3-1>
On 19.06.2023 11:58, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 06/16/2023 16:53, Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) wrote:
>
> Hi Radu,
>
>>
>> On TJA1120 engineering samples, the new timestamp is stuck in the FIFO.
>> If the MORE_TS bit is set and the VALID bit is not set, we know that we
>> have a timestamp in the FIFO but not in the buffer.
>>
>> To move the new timestamp in the buffer registers, the current
>> timestamp(which is invalid) is unlocked by writing any of the buffer
>> registers.
>
> Shouldn't this be split and merged in patch 9 and patch 10?
> As those two patches introduced this functions with issues.
>
Ok. I will merge the workarounds in patches 9 and 12 if it looks better
to you. The intention here was to implement the timestamp reading
sequence in a clean way and to add the workarounds later.
>>
>>
>
> --
> /Horatiu
--
Radu P.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-19 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-16 13:53 [PATCH net-next v1 00/14] Add TJA1120 support Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 01/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: fix the PTP interrupt enablig/disabling Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 20:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-19 8:42 ` Radu Pirea (OSS)
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 02/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: use phylib master/slave implementation Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 20:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 03/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: remove RX BIST frame counters Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 20:39 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-22 12:21 ` Radu Pirea (OSS)
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 04/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add *_reg_field functions Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 20:42 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 05/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: prepare the ground for TJA1120 Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 19:35 ` Simon Horman
2023-06-19 7:53 ` Horatiu Vultur
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 06/14] net: phy: add 1000baseT1 to phy_basic_t1_features Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 20:49 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-19 11:01 ` Radu Pirea (OSS)
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 07/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add TJA1120 support Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 08/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: enable LTC sampling on both ext_ts edges Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-19 8:10 ` Horatiu Vultur
2023-06-19 8:36 ` Radu Pirea (OSS)
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 09/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: read egress ts on TJA1120 Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 10/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: handle FUSA irq Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 20:55 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-19 6:31 ` Radu Pirea (OSS)
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 11/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: run cable test with the PHY in test mode Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 12/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: read ext trig ts TJA1120 Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-19 8:49 ` Horatiu Vultur
2023-06-19 10:07 ` Radu Pirea (OSS)
2023-06-19 10:48 ` Horatiu Vultur
2023-06-20 14:31 ` Radu Pirea (OSS)
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 13/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: reset PCS if the link goes down Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-16 21:00 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-06-19 6:17 ` Radu Pirea (OSS)
2023-06-16 13:53 ` [PATCH net-next v1 14/14] net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: timestamp reading workaround for TJA1120 Radu Pirea (NXP OSS)
2023-06-19 8:58 ` Horatiu Vultur
2023-06-19 9:46 ` Radu Pirea (OSS) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7eda291f-1e2a-1af6-ae25-785b6eccc281@oss.nxp.com \
--to=radu-nicolae.pirea@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=sebastian.tobuschat@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox