From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: "Mika Penttilä" <mpenttil@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Potapenko" <glider@google.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Brendan Jackman" <jackmanb@google.com>,
"Christoph Lameter" <cl@gentwo.org>,
"Dennis Zhou" <dennis@kernel.org>,
"Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, io-uring@vger.kernel.org,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@axis.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
"Marco Elver" <elver@google.com>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Muchun Song" <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Oscar Salvador" <osalvador@suse.de>,
"Peter Xu" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, x86@kernel.org,
"Zi Yan" <ziy@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: update kernel-doc for MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 20:32:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ffd0abd-27a1-40a8-b538-9a01e21abb29@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aKyWIriZ1bmnIrBW@kernel.org>
On 25.08.25 18:58, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 06:23:48PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>
>> I don't quite understand the interaction with PG_Reserved and why anybody
>> using this function should care.
>>
>> So maybe you can rephrase in a way that is easier to digest, and rather
>> focuses on what callers of this function are supposed to do vs. have the
>> liberty of not doing?
>
> How about
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> index b96746376e17..fcda8481de9a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memblock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
> @@ -40,8 +40,9 @@ extern unsigned long long max_possible_pfn;
> * via a driver, and never indicated in the firmware-provided memory map as
> * system RAM. This corresponds to IORESOURCE_SYSRAM_DRIVER_MANAGED in the
> * kernel resource tree.
> - * @MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT: memory region for which struct pages are
> - * not initialized (only for reserved regions).
> + * @MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT: reserved memory region for which struct pages are not
> + * fully initialized. Users of this flag are responsible to properly initialize
> + * struct pages of this region
> * @MEMBLOCK_RSRV_KERN: memory region that is reserved for kernel use,
> * either explictitly with memblock_reserve_kern() or via memblock
> * allocation APIs. All memblock allocations set this flag.
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index 154f1d73b61f..46b411fb3630 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -1091,13 +1091,20 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_clear_nomap(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
>
> /**
> * memblock_reserved_mark_noinit - Mark a reserved memory region with flag
> - * MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT which results in the struct pages not being initialized
> - * for this region.
> + * MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT
> + *
> * @base: the base phys addr of the region
> * @size: the size of the region
> *
> - * struct pages will not be initialized for reserved memory regions marked with
> - * %MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT.
> + * The struct pages for the reserved regions marked %MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT will
> + * not be fully initialized to allow the caller optimize their initialization.
> + *
> + * When %CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is enabled, setting this flag
> + * completely bypasses the initialization of struct pages for such region.
> + *
> + * When %CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT is disabled, struct pages in this
> + * region will be initialized with default values but won't be marked as
> + * reserved.
Sounds good.
I am surprised regarding "reserved", but I guess that's because we don't
end up calling "reserve_bootmem_region()" on these regions in
memmap_init_reserved_pages().
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-25 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-21 20:06 [PATCH RFC 00/35] mm: remove nth_page() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 01/35] mm: stop making SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP user-selectable David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:20 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-22 15:09 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-22 17:02 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 02/35] arm64: Kconfig: drop superfluous "select SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP" David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 15:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 03/35] s390/Kconfig: " David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 15:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 04/35] x86/Kconfig: " David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 15:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 05/35] wireguard: selftests: remove CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=y from qemu kernel config David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 15:13 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 06/35] mm/page_alloc: reject unreasonable folio/compound page sizes in alloc_contig_range_noprof() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:23 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-22 17:07 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 07/35] mm/memremap: reject unreasonable folio/compound page sizes in memremap_pages() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 17:09 ` SeongJae Park
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 08/35] mm/hugetlb: check for unreasonable folio sizes when registering hstate David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 09/35] mm/mm_init: make memmap_init_compound() look more like prep_compound_page() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 15:27 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-22 18:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 10/35] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 4:09 ` Mika Penttilä
2025-08-22 6:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-23 8:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-25 12:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-25 14:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-25 14:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-25 14:59 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-25 15:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-25 16:17 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-25 16:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-25 16:58 ` update kernel-doc for MEMBLOCK_RSRV_NOINIT (was: Re: [PATCH RFC 10/35] mm/hugetlb: cleanup hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap()) Mike Rapoport
2025-08-25 18:32 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 11/35] mm: sanity-check maximum folio size in folio_set_order() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:36 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 12/35] mm: limit folio/compound page sizes in problematic kernel configs David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:46 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-21 20:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:50 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-24 13:24 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 13/35] mm: simplify folio_page() and folio_page_idx() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:55 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-21 21:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 14/35] mm/mm/percpu-km: drop nth_page() usage within single allocation David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 15/35] fs: hugetlbfs: remove nth_page() usage within folio in adjust_range_hwpoison() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 16/35] mm/pagewalk: drop nth_page() usage within folio in folio_walk_start() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 17/35] mm/gup: drop nth_page() usage within folio when recording subpages David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 18/35] io_uring/zcrx: remove "struct io_copy_cache" and one nth_page() usage David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 11:32 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-22 13:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-27 9:43 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 19/35] io_uring/zcrx: remove nth_page() usage within folio David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 20/35] mips: mm: convert __flush_dcache_pages() to __flush_dcache_folio_pages() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 21/35] mm/cma: refuse handing out non-contiguous page ranges David Hildenbrand
2025-08-26 10:45 ` Alexandru Elisei
2025-08-26 11:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-26 13:03 ` Alexandru Elisei
2025-08-26 13:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-26 13:11 ` Alexandru Elisei
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 22/35] dma-remap: drop nth_page() in dma_common_contiguous_remap() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 8:15 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 23/35] scatterlist: disallow non-contigous page ranges in a single SG entry David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 8:15 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 24/35] ata: libata-eh: drop nth_page() usage within " David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 1:59 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-22 6:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 25/35] drm/i915/gem: " David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 26/35] mspro_block: " David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 9:58 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 27/35] memstick: " David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 9:58 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 28/35] mmc: " David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 9:58 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 29/35] scsi: core: " David Hildenbrand
2025-08-22 18:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-22 18:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 30/35] vfio/pci: " David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 31/35] crypto: remove " David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-08-21 20:29 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-08-21 20:37 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 32/35] mm/gup: drop nth_page() usage in unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:06 ` [PATCH RFC 33/35] kfence: drop nth_page() usage David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 21:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:07 ` [PATCH RFC 34/35] block: update comment of "struct bio_vec" regarding nth_page() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 20:07 ` [PATCH RFC 35/35] mm: remove nth_page() David Hildenbrand
2025-08-21 21:37 ` [syzbot ci] " syzbot ci
2025-08-22 14:30 ` [PATCH RFC 00/35] " Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ffd0abd-27a1-40a8-b538-9a01e21abb29@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dennis@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@axis.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mpenttil@redhat.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).