From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: Kendall Willis <k-willis@ti.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] pmdommain: add support system-wide resume latency constraints
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2026 09:43:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7h342nqu3e.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <057547c9-773e-4ba2-a754-aede29d07daa@ti.com>
Kendall Willis <k-willis@ti.com> writes:
> Hi Kevin,
> On 2/5/26 18:29, Kevin Hilman (TI) wrote:
>> In addition to checking for CPU latency constraints when checking if
>> OK to power down a domain, also check for QoS latency constraints in
>> all devices of a domain and use that in determining the final latency
>> constraint to use for the domain.
>>
>> Since cpu_system_power_down_ok() is used for system-wide suspend, the
>> per-device constratints are only relevant if the LATENCY_SYS QoS flag
>> is set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman (TI) <khilman@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>
> Were you planning to also check the CPU devices QoS latency constraints
> in the cpu_system_power_down_ok function? At present, this patch does
> not add that functionality so if the PM_QOS_FLAG_LATENCY_SYS is present
> for a CPU device, the QoS latency is not taken into account.
I did not add that functionality because the CPUs are managed by the new
system-wide /dev/cpu_wakeup_latency, which is already checked.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-26 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-06 0:29 [PATCH v2 0/3] PM: QoS/pmdomains: support resume latencies for system-wide PM Kevin Hilman (TI)
2026-02-06 0:29 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] PM / QoS: add flag to indicate latency applies system-wide Kevin Hilman (TI)
2026-02-10 16:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-02-06 0:29 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] pmdomain: core: add genpd_for_each_child() helper Kevin Hilman (TI)
2026-03-10 10:09 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-02-06 0:29 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] pmdommain: add support system-wide resume latency constraints Kevin Hilman (TI)
2026-02-11 21:29 ` Kendall Willis
2026-02-26 17:43 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2026-03-10 10:23 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7h342nqu3e.fsf@baylibre.com \
--to=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=k-willis@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox