Re: [PATCH v8 6/7] clk: hi6220: Clock driver support for Hisilicon hi6220 SoC

[Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>]

Bintian <bintian.wang@huawei.com> writes:

> Hello Mike,
>
> On 2015/5/28 13:26, Michael Turquette wrote:
>> Quoting Bintian Wang (2015-05-23 21:11:11)
>>> Add clock drivers for hi6220 SoC, this driver controls the SoC
>>> registers to supply different clocks to different IPs in the SoC.
>>>
>>> We add one divider clock for hi6220 because the divider in hi6220
>>> also has a mask bit but it doesnot obey the rule defined by flag
>>> "CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK", we can not get index of the mask bit by
>>> left shift fixed bits (e.g. 16 bits), so we add this divider clock
>>> to handle it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bintian Wang <bintian.wang@huawei.com>
>>> Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
>>> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>> Tested-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@linaro.org>
>>
>> Hi Bintian,
>>
>> Thanks for making the changes requested by Stephen. I've taken his patch
>> to add assigned-clock-rate/parent support for AMBA interconnects and
>> applied it to 4.1-rc1, and then I've applied your v8 patches #4-6 on top
>> of that. You can find it at:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git clk-next-hi6220
> Thank you very much!
>
> I think you also need to pick patch "[PATCH v5 3/6] clk: hi6220:
> Document devicetree bindings for hi6220 clock",  which described the
> dt binding of clk, and it is also acked by Stephen(v4 is the same to
> v5).
>
>> I have merged this into clk-next so it can get some cycles in
>> linux-next.
>>
>> Stephen,
>>
>> Can you send your patch out to Russell properly? It needs his ack (or
>> for him to take it outright) in order to unblock the hi6220 clock driver
>> from being merged.
> It doesn't block hi6220 clock driver now, because the UART1 is not
> enabled in hi6220 dts now.

Now that the clk changes are queued up, can you (re)post the remaining
hikey patches with a changelog stating the dependency on the clk-next
branch.  I believe what's left is just the DT and Kconfig/defconfig
changes, correct?

With some acks from the DT maintainers, these should be ready to be
merged through arm-soc.

Thanks,

Kevin