From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE94C433F5 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 21:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236313AbiDHVMz (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2022 17:12:55 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57380 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239766AbiDHVMw (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2022 17:12:52 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC61A181D8B for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2022 14:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id r66so8804674pgr.3 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 14:10:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=NGL7uIJYy64vRyv+WyTds0iR2sbu1H6xVYp+rBwYsq0=; b=0goe0SNyqeqNy9wKzBOTFC+7DmniXqC3vl6B6Ja5dbVTVTC/BZKzxTot9QUgRHj3YF TX9uws+8EDjls/VkPD49zygJEFl3fLPDh7wOGrUaQQ8Yi9manuILnBLXpKiJbDtK6wkd GBiXXLaiaTeyvR6B0bEboiCWp+bmK6fpIW/N2D87y5kKLuBdCDygGdepx6sOGFnlnlPU f25f1FkaVYI5MTYGDfi/LHNLH7gGp3EbDDCmm+zhZ3uyTsz7D43liONM+N5RJmkiJYTt 63QBbMSvZi3/thOx0tR9I1AIZtqdN8wPSiaDxF/GgO4azda9Ys9eZDXwB5bc14UwGZJd PrcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=NGL7uIJYy64vRyv+WyTds0iR2sbu1H6xVYp+rBwYsq0=; b=jJtgu94P4ITf3hZV0McBkUvHAxJRO82ZUjzbwHNH387IDlhY9h2bZlsS2Pkv+8PRB7 fVV6Br4pSeUCgb7yBmeGhVJU8PlEt7zjUKRMguoLlvefeRMxz71u8OboA2fautsiqjKT VeqrBE2EXl+BkBxfRiXfdcMyBG1AAjMHSVV1Fh6oKbm5Qb35Vr93eLdCqLp3/e9nhrbG 5Yml46g5A0hdy/0eCG+kxZKZUckw+DVMMrVbvTZwPXnQ/J/NXvohcCoWQ0JtPnkXpSuL yViOXJWOKyri82jLEhAUjcxjNEa5CZ1nvOPsf0/DYK81gUfDb4JQE14n+hf6aCplYJa3 qs6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fEQjnM72rtzU5AKn3CvWsZJpY3D3z9lS1QAyZ5dpyf9GkrIVP GZWJVXC6OGgEwftZXbNHzJPzRZx6mlqWeQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5mutMPEroFwzVQlx6BF6zMMQsdO7eg6KiAaxV8KEQBMyUxgjwuUVnLSqBovjUXQR6fpGbkw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:4f0d:0:b0:399:5115:ff48 with SMTP id d13-20020a634f0d000000b003995115ff48mr17296204pgb.235.1649452247397; Fri, 08 Apr 2022 14:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (c-71-197-186-152.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [71.197.186.152]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v4-20020a17090a00c400b001cb4f242c92sm2330393pjd.26.2022.04.08.14.10.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 08 Apr 2022 14:10:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Hilman To: Rex-BC Chen , rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org Cc: matthias.bgg@gmail.com, jia-wei.chang@mediatek.com, roger.lu@mediatek.com, hsinyi@google.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com, Rex-BC Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 14/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Add support for MT8186 In-Reply-To: <20220408045908.21671-15-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> References: <20220408045908.21671-1-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> <20220408045908.21671-15-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 14:10:46 -0700 Message-ID: <7h8rsf5lih.fsf@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rex-BC Chen writes: > From: Jia-Wei Chang > > The platform data of MT8186 is different from previous MediaTek SoCs, > so we add a new compatible and platform data for it. > > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang > Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen There's no upstream DT for MT8186, so I"m curious how this was tested/valiated with upstream? Kevin