public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2025 17:28:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ha511i7yb.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251105115402.1b03f921@canb.auug.org.au>

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the omap tree got a conflict in:
>
>   arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig
>
> between commit:
>
>   c065b6046b34 ("Use CONFIG_EXT4_FS instead of CONFIG_EXT3_FS in all of the defconfigs")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
>   810c5ef6efe9 ("arm: omap2plus_defconfig: enable ext4 directly")
>
> from the omap tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the latter includes the former) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.

Thanks for catching this.  I'll drop the patch from the omap tree.

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-05  1:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-05  0:54 linux-next: manual merge of the omap tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-05  1:28 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2025-11-05  3:39   ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-09-17 11:52 Mark Brown
2009-10-30  0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-30 14:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-10-31  4:31   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-30  0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-30 14:45 ` Tony Lindgren
2009-10-31  4:30   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7ha511i7yb.fsf@baylibre.com \
    --to=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=andreas@kemnade.info \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox