From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:03:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hbnxtwk7l.fsf@paris.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FF42247A-A4E8-4AA2-9C3B-BEEFC2F61714@codeaurora.org> (Kumar Gala's message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:22:47 -0600")
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> writes:
> On Feb 26, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> Introduce a new mach-qcom that will support SoCs that intend to be
>>> multiplatform compatiable while keeping mach-msm to legacy SoC/board
>>> support that will not transition over to multiplatform.
>>>
>>> As part of this, we move support for MSM8X60, MSM8960 and MSM8974 over
>>> to mach-qcom.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Having a closer look at this after seeing the multi_v7_defconfig change,
>> I have a minor nit on the new ARCH_QCOM name.
>>
>> For new additions, we've been trying to move towards using SOC_foo
>> instead of ARCH_foo. Any reason not to do that here also?
>>
>> Kevin
>
> No reason, just wasn’t aware and no one said anything til now.
Yeah, sorry for not reviewiing sooner.
> Hmm, how to handle this now, can we do this as a 3.16 cleanup?
Yes, we've already merged it, so doing it as a cleanup should be fine.
Thanks,
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-26 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-30 18:36 [PATCH 0/4] Split mach-msm into legacy and mach-qcom (multiplatform) Kumar Gala
2014-01-30 18:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] clocksource: qcom: Move clocksource code out of mach-msm Kumar Gala
2014-01-30 18:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm: qcom: Split Qualcomm support into legacy and multiplatform Kumar Gala
2014-01-31 19:10 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-31 19:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-31 19:25 ` Kumar Gala
2014-01-31 19:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-31 19:45 ` Kumar Gala
2014-01-31 20:11 ` Rob Herring
2014-02-26 14:22 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-02-26 17:22 ` Kumar Gala
2014-02-26 23:03 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2014-01-30 18:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] clocksource: qcom: split building of legacy vs multiplatform support Kumar Gala
2014-01-30 18:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] tty: serial: msm: Enable building msm_serial for ARCH_QCOM Kumar Gala
2014-01-30 22:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-01-31 19:11 ` [PATCH 0/4] Split mach-msm into legacy and mach-qcom (multiplatform) Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7hbnxtwk7l.fsf@paris.lan \
--to=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox