From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752847AbaE0Ros (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2014 13:44:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.220.45]:35851 "EHLO mail-pa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752747AbaE0Roo (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2014 13:44:44 -0400 From: Kevin Hilman To: Tarek Dakhran Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Rob Landley , Kukjin Kim , Russell King , Ben Dooks , Tomasz Figa , Mike Turquette , Vyacheslav Tyrtov , Thomas Abraham , Kyungmin Park , Heiko Stuebner , Romain Naour , Chander Kashyap , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Tarek Dakhran Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] Exynos 5410 support References: <1401074613-29227-1-git-send-email-t.dakhran@samsung.com> <7hr43f9mmn.fsf@paris.lan> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 10:44:40 -0700 In-Reply-To: <7hr43f9mmn.fsf@paris.lan> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Tue, 27 May 2014 10:06:56 -0700") Message-ID: <7hd2ez9kvr.fsf@paris.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kevin Hilman writes: > Tarek Dakhran writes: > >> The series of patches represent support of Exynos 5410 SoC >> >> The Exynos 5410 is the first Samsung SoC based on big.LITTLE architecture >> >> Patches add new platform description, support of clock controller and device >> tree for Exynos 5410. >> >> Has been build on Samsung Linux Kernel >> (branch: for-next, commit: 97eae6c Merge branch 'v3.16-next/multiplatform' into for-next) >> >> Has been tested on: 1) Exynos 5410 reference board (exynos_defconfig) >> 2) Exynos 5410 reference board (multi_v7_defconfig) >> 3) Odroid-XU board (exynos_defconfig) >> 4) Odroid-XU board (multi_v7_defconfig) > > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman > > FYI, I boot tested this on an odroid-xu (exynos_defconfig and > multi_v7_defconfig.) Oops, I may have spoke to soon. There seem to be some problems with multi_v7_defconfig. Applying this series directly on the commit mentioned above and testing, it works just fine using multi_v7_defconfig. However, if I directly test the current contents of the samsung for-next branch (where this series has been merged) it no longer boots on the odroid-xu. A quick diff shows that there are some other changes to multi_v7_defconfig in the samsung/for-next branch that may be causing problems here. Kevin