[PATCH RESEND] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Don't fail probe if int not found

[PATCH RESEND] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Don't fail probe if int not found

[Judith Mendez]

Some timers may not have an interrupt routed to
the A53 GIC, but the timer PWM functionality can still
be used by Linux Kernel. Therefore, do not fail probe
if interrupt is not found and ti,timer-pwm exists.

Fixes: df28472a1b28 ("ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: platform driver")
Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Rebased, add to CC list, add fixes tag
---
 drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c | 8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
index b7a34b1a975e..1b61fefed213 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
@@ -1104,8 +1104,12 @@ static int omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return  -ENOMEM;
 
 	timer->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (timer->irq < 0)
-		return timer->irq;
+	if (timer->irq < 0) {
+		if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "ti,timer-pwm"))
+			dev_err(dev, "Did not find timer interrupt, timer usable in PWM mode only\n");
+		else
+			return timer->irq;
+	}
 
 	timer->io_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(timer->io_base))

base-commit: d3d1556696c1a993eec54ac585fe5bf677e07474
-- 
2.46.2

Re: [PATCH RESEND] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Don't fail probe if int not found

[Bryan Brattlof]

On October 10, 2024 thus sayeth Judith Mendez:
> Some timers may not have an interrupt routed to
> the A53 GIC, but the timer PWM functionality can still
> be used by Linux Kernel. Therefore, do not fail probe
> if interrupt is not found and ti,timer-pwm exists.
> 
> Fixes: df28472a1b28 ("ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: platform driver")
> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Rebased, add to CC list, add fixes tag
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
> index b7a34b1a975e..1b61fefed213 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
> @@ -1104,8 +1104,12 @@ static int omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return  -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	timer->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -	if (timer->irq < 0)
> -		return timer->irq;
> +	if (timer->irq < 0) {
> +		if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "ti,timer-pwm"))
> +			dev_err(dev, "Did not find timer interrupt, timer usable in PWM mode only\n");

Is this really an error? or more of a dev_info() type problem. It looks
like we changed how we integrated the timer in K3 chips that broke some 
assumptions made in OMAP.

~Bryan

Re: [PATCH RESEND] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Don't fail probe if int not found

[Judith Mendez]

Hi Bryan,

On 10/10/24 4:18 PM, Bryan Brattlof wrote:
> On October 10, 2024 thus sayeth Judith Mendez:
>> Some timers may not have an interrupt routed to
>> the A53 GIC, but the timer PWM functionality can still
>> be used by Linux Kernel. Therefore, do not fail probe
>> if interrupt is not found and ti,timer-pwm exists.
>>
>> Fixes: df28472a1b28 ("ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: platform driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Rebased, add to CC list, add fixes tag
>> ---
>>   drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c | 8 ++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
>> index b7a34b1a975e..1b61fefed213 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
>> @@ -1104,8 +1104,12 @@ static int omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   		return  -ENOMEM;
>>   
>>   	timer->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> -	if (timer->irq < 0)
>> -		return timer->irq;
>> +	if (timer->irq < 0) {
>> +		if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "ti,timer-pwm"))
>> +			dev_err(dev, "Did not find timer interrupt, timer usable in PWM mode only\n");
> 
> Is this really an error? or more of a dev_info() type problem. It looks
> like we changed how we integrated the timer in K3 chips that broke some
> assumptions made in OMAP.

I can switch to dev_info() no problem, thanks for reviewing!

~ Judith

> 
> ~Bryan

Re: [PATCH RESEND] clocksource/drivers/timer-ti-dm: Don't fail probe if int not found

[Kevin Hilman]

Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com> writes:

> Some timers may not have an interrupt routed to
> the A53 GIC, but the timer PWM functionality can still
> be used by Linux Kernel. Therefore, do not fail probe
> if interrupt is not found and ti,timer-pwm exists.
>
> Fixes: df28472a1b28 ("ARM: OMAP: dmtimer: platform driver")
> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Rebased, add to CC list, add fixes tag
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
> index b7a34b1a975e..1b61fefed213 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c
> @@ -1104,8 +1104,12 @@ static int omap_dm_timer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return  -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	timer->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -	if (timer->irq < 0)
> -		return timer->irq;
> +	if (timer->irq < 0) {
> +		if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "ti,timer-pwm"))

nit: this propoery is read from the DT again just a bit lower.  Rather
than parse the DT for this property twice, can you move this after the
DT properties are already parsed, and then just check for
(timer->capability & OMAP_TIMER_HAS_PWM) ?

Kevin