From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, hughd@google.com, mhocko@suse.com,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, muchun.song@linux.dev,
david@redhat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, ziy@nvidia.com,
harry.yoo@oracle.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com, npache@redhat.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, dev.jain@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org,
lance.yang@linux.dev, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: thp: reparent the split queue during memcg offline
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 09:23:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ia4bjn06w62.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55370bda7b2df617033ac12116c1712144bb7591.1758618527.git.zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> (Qi Zheng's message of "Tue, 23 Sep 2025 17:16:25 +0800")
Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> writes:
> In the future, we will reparent LRU folios during memcg offline to
> eliminate dying memory cgroups, which requires reparenting the split queue
> to its parent.
Nit: commit logs should really focus on the actual change, not the future
plans.
>
> Similar to list_lru, the split queue is relatively independent and does
> not need to be reparented along with objcg and LRU folios (holding
> objcg lock and lru lock). So let's apply the same mechanism as list_lru
> to reparent the split queue separately when memcg is offine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> ---
> include/linux/huge_mm.h | 2 ++
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 1 +
> mm/huge_memory.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 1 +
> mm/mm_init.c | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> index f327d62fc9852..a0d4b751974d2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ static inline int split_huge_page(struct page *page)
> return split_huge_page_to_list_to_order(page, NULL, ret);
> }
> void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped);
> +void reparent_deferred_split_queue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
>
> void __split_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
> unsigned long address, bool freeze);
> @@ -611,6 +612,7 @@ static inline int try_folio_split(struct folio *folio, struct page *page,
> }
>
> static inline void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio, bool partially_mapped) {}
> +static inline void reparent_deferred_split_queue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) {}
> #define split_huge_pmd(__vma, __pmd, __address) \
> do { } while (0)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 7fb7331c57250..f3eb81fee056a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -1346,6 +1346,7 @@ struct deferred_split {
> spinlock_t split_queue_lock;
> struct list_head split_queue;
> unsigned long split_queue_len;
> + bool is_dying;
> };
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 48b51e6230a67..de7806f759cba 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -1094,9 +1094,15 @@ static struct deferred_split *folio_split_queue_lock(struct folio *folio)
> struct deferred_split *queue;
>
> memcg = folio_memcg(folio);
> +retry:
> queue = memcg ? &memcg->deferred_split_queue :
> &NODE_DATA(folio_nid(folio))->deferred_split_queue;
> spin_lock(&queue->split_queue_lock);
> + if (unlikely(queue->is_dying == true)) {
> + spin_unlock(&queue->split_queue_lock);
> + memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg);
> + goto retry;
> + }
>
> return queue;
> }
> @@ -1108,9 +1114,15 @@ folio_split_queue_lock_irqsave(struct folio *folio, unsigned long *flags)
> struct deferred_split *queue;
>
> memcg = folio_memcg(folio);
> +retry:
> queue = memcg ? &memcg->deferred_split_queue :
> &NODE_DATA(folio_nid(folio))->deferred_split_queue;
> spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->split_queue_lock, *flags);
> + if (unlikely(queue->is_dying == true)) {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->split_queue_lock, *flags);
> + memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg);
> + goto retry;
> + }
>
> return queue;
> }
> @@ -4284,6 +4296,33 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
> return split;
> }
>
> +void reparent_deferred_split_queue(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup *parent = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg);
> + struct deferred_split *ds_queue = &memcg->deferred_split_queue;
> + struct deferred_split *parent_ds_queue = &parent->deferred_split_queue;
> + int nid;
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> + spin_lock_nested(&parent_ds_queue->split_queue_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> +
> + if (!ds_queue->split_queue_len)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + list_splice_tail_init(&ds_queue->split_queue, &parent_ds_queue->split_queue);
> + parent_ds_queue->split_queue_len += ds_queue->split_queue_len;
> + ds_queue->split_queue_len = 0;
> + /* Mark the ds_queue dead */
> + ds_queue->is_dying = true;
> +
> + for_each_node(nid)
> + set_shrinker_bit(parent, nid, shrinker_id(deferred_split_shrinker));
Does this loop need to be under locks?
> +
> +unlock:
> + spin_unlock(&parent_ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock);
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> static void split_huge_pages_all(void)
> {
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index e090f29eb03bd..d03da72e7585d 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -3887,6 +3887,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_offline(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> zswap_memcg_offline_cleanup(memcg);
>
> memcg_offline_kmem(memcg);
> + reparent_deferred_split_queue(memcg);
> reparent_shrinker_deferred(memcg);
I guess the naming can be a bit more consistent here :)
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-24 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 9:16 [PATCH v2 0/4] reparent the THP split queue Qi Zheng
2025-09-23 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: thp: replace folio_memcg() with folio_memcg_charged() Qi Zheng
2025-09-24 9:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-09-23 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: thp: introduce folio_split_queue_lock and its variants Qi Zheng
2025-09-23 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: thp: use folio_batch to handle THP splitting in deferred_split_scan() Qi Zheng
2025-09-23 15:31 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-24 9:57 ` Qi Zheng
2025-09-24 14:57 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-24 12:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-23 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: thp: reparent the split queue during memcg offline Qi Zheng
2025-09-23 15:44 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-24 9:58 ` Qi Zheng
2025-09-24 9:23 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2025-09-24 10:06 ` Qi Zheng
2025-09-24 12:38 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 6:11 ` Qi Zheng
2025-09-25 19:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-09-25 19:49 ` Zi Yan
2025-09-25 22:15 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-25 22:35 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-26 6:57 ` Qi Zheng
2025-09-26 16:36 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-09-24 13:49 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-24 14:22 ` Harry Yoo
2025-09-25 6:29 ` Qi Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ia4bjn06w62.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com \
--to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox