Re: non-gcc linux? (was Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10?)

Christoph Hellwig
2000-11-02T20:28:35Z

In article <20001102212124.A15054@gruyere.muc.suse.de> you wrote:
> You also forgot named structure initializers, but C99 supports them
> again with a different syntax than gcc [I guess it would have been too easy
> to just use the gcc syntax]

The named initializers syntax in C99 is from plan9, besides beeing probably
older, it is from the C creators and more logic ;)

I think that are enough reasons for the ANSI people to not choose the GCC
syntax.

Christoph

--
Always remember that you are unique. Just like everyone else.