Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ?

Marc Lehmann
2000-11-02T02:43:06Z

On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 03:45:24PM -0800, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
> explain why RedHat includes a compiler that doesn't work with the
>
> Because the kernel is buggy (the specifics of this has been discussed

But redhat's compiler is much, much buggier, as has been discussed here
as well. Actually, redhat's gcc branch fails to compile a large amount of
userspace applications that aren't buggy.

I thought redhat already agreed that they made a bad decision in many
regards and the real reason for having the compiler was mere policy of not
switching the compiler duing a major release, and rehdat wanted to have a
newer compiler in any case.

...

> they did XXX" I would expect you to defend your employer as well if I
> misrepresented them due to incorrect statements. Right? :-)

Sometimes one just keeps quiet, and that's o.k.

--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@opengroup.org |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|