From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: About Celeron processor memory barrier problem
Date: 24 Dec 2000 11:36:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7sSHLPCmw-B@khms.westfalen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012230920330.2066-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012230920330.2066-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) wrote on 23.12.00 in <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012230920330.2066-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>:
> On Thu, 23 Dec 1999, michael chen wrote:
> > I found that when I compiled the 2.4 kernel with the option
> > of Pentium III or Pentium 4 on a Celeron's PC, it could cause the
> > system hang at very beginning boot stage, and I found the problem
> > is cause by the fact that Intel Celeron doesn't have a real memory
> > barrier,but when you choose the Pentium III option, the kernel
> > assume the processor has a real memory barrier.
> > Here is a patch to fix it:
>
> No.
>
> The fix is to not lie to the configurator.
>
> A Celeron isn't a PIII, and you shouldn't tell the configure that it is.
>
> The whole point of being able to choose the CPU to optimize for is that we
> can optimize things at compile-time.
Which is all fine, but maybe the kernel really ought to detect that
problem and complain at boot time?
Or does that happen already?
MfG Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-24 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-12-23 9:24 About Celeron processor memory barrier problem michael chen
2000-12-23 11:04 ` Erik Mouw
2000-12-23 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-12-23 23:27 ` Erik Mouw
2000-12-24 9:45 ` Jeffrey Rose
2000-12-24 11:48 ` Erik Mouw
2000-12-23 23:36 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2000-12-24 9:36 ` Kai Henningsen [this message]
2000-12-24 20:50 ` Tim Wright
2000-12-24 22:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-12-25 2:38 ` Tim Wright
2000-12-25 7:19 ` The Doctor What
2000-12-26 1:40 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-26 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-12-26 22:31 ` Rogier Wolff
2001-01-01 11:55 ` Riley Williams
2000-12-25 11:12 ` Kai Henningsen
2000-12-25 19:37 ` Ian Stirling
2000-12-26 20:38 ` Pavel Machek
2000-12-26 0:15 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2000-12-23 22:34 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] <fa.gm0b5nv.1h2mope@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.n7l96dv.2nah0l@ifi.uio.no>
2000-12-26 19:24 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7sSHLPCmw-B@khms.westfalen.de \
--to=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox