From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751249Ab1LUF2W (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:28:22 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:56595 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750698Ab1LUF2S (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:28:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=gSLWaXDsTLB+xqW4x1so/uwCwnr15K7b Ci+/4Lvl3LBfBtOMKl5qkZhw9jWTAy2uv4LKHuwVOgrD6EhYXRwTOx87lpXLwc6p sge4TcLVexLJaKdGl7lt5GLQC5QIyEv46O8JhDOF+rDUFCnues4q9PwVF9Mj/QJG aX3wQmAAuPE= From: Junio C Hamano To: "Ted Ts'o" Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ext4 bugfixes for 3.2-rc5 References: <20111215190846.GA2709@thunk.org> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:28:15 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20111215190846.GA2709@thunk.org> (Ted Ts'o's message of "Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:08:46 -0500") Message-ID: <7vd3biijdc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 964BE0E0-2B94-11E1-9653-9DB42E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ted Ts'o writes: > Cool! Does it save enough that GPG signature information can be > verified later? I'm a little fuzzy on what is covered by the > signature which gets verified when you run the command "git verify-tag > tytso-for-linus-20111214". Better yet, does the new version of git > have a command that will automatically verify the digital signature > found in a merge commit? > > And this isn't in 1.7.8 yet, right? I'd have to build version of git > based on the next branch to play with this new signatury goodness? The 'master' branch as of this week has the topic merged.