* Re: Negative dynamic priorities in 2.5.6[4-6]?
@ 2003-03-25 18:52 Jon Burgess
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jon Burgess @ 2003-03-25 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: usenet; +Cc: linux-kernel
> top from procps-2.0.11 treats PRI as an unsigned long long
Known problem with top, for fix see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85423
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Negative dynamic priorities in 2.5.6[4-6]?
@ 2003-03-25 14:51 Erik Hensema
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Erik Hensema @ 2003-03-25 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
Since upgrading to 2.5.64 from 2.4.x, I'm seeing negative dynamic
priorities in top. top from procps-2.0.11 treats PRI as an unsigned long
long, so it displays negative priorities as being extremely large.
After changing the format specifier, top displays -51 for artsd:
PID USER PRI NI SIZE SWAP RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
1136 erik -51 0 11040 4592 6448 8828 S 1.5 1.2 0:36 artsd
kernel 2.5.66 vanilla
procps 2.0.11
arts 1.1-50 packaged for suse 8.0
this is while playing a shoutcast mp3 stream.
Is this normal behaviour?
--
Erik Hensema <erik@hensema.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-25 18:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-25 18:52 Negative dynamic priorities in 2.5.6[4-6]? Jon Burgess
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-25 14:51 Erik Hensema
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox