From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
usb4-upstream@oss.qualcomm.com,
Raghavendra Thoorpu <rthoorpu@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: host: xhci: Allow non-Intel usb_link_tunnel_mode reporting
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 15:48:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <803cc760-93f3-429e-bae3-669f86c07585@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02b4a4ca-c091-47b0-bae7-e38d9fa77850@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 5/7/26 13:40, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 5/5/26 2:14 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 10:55:04AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>
>>> The Thunderbolt framework relies on the USB core to create device links
>>> for tunneled ports, so that the USB3 controller is only kept
>>> runtime-resumed for the duration of the tunneling.
>>>
>>> Currently, retrieving that information is only possibe on Intel XHCI
>>> hosts, through a vendor-specific capability. Extend xhci-plat to allow
>>> plumbing a custom one.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c | 4 ++--
>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.c | 2 ++
>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-plat.h | 1 +
>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 6 +++++-
>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 5 ++++-
>>> 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>> index bacd0ddd0d09..09e5da912066 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c
>>> @@ -750,7 +750,7 @@ static int xhci_exit_test_mode(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
>>> }
>>>
>>> /**
>>> - * xhci_port_is_tunneled() - Check if USB3 connection is tunneled over USB4
>>> + * xhci_port_tunnel_mode() - Check if USB3 connection is tunneled over USB4
>>> * @xhci: xhci host controller
>>> * @port: USB3 port to be checked.
>>> *
>>> @@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static int xhci_exit_test_mode(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
>>> * detecting USB3 over USB4 tunnels. USB_LINK_NATIVE or USB_LINK_TUNNELED
>>> * otherwise.
>>> */
>>> -enum usb_link_tunnel_mode xhci_port_is_tunneled(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
>>> +enum usb_link_tunnel_mode xhci_port_tunnel_mode(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
>>> struct xhci_port *port)
>>
>> I'm wondering if this could be:
>>
>> bool xhci_port_is_tunneled()
>>
>> becase if I understand correctly that's the only information we need e.g is
>> it going over tunnel or not.
>
> It was originally introduced as a tristate enum in:
>
> f46a6e165197 ("usb: Add tunnel_mode parameter to usb device structure")
>
> but the usefulness of USB_LINK_UNKNOWN is limited to a dev_dbg() print..
> I don't really have strong opinions either way
>
Tunnel detection can be tried other ways if state is USB_LINK_UNKNOWN.
For example usb-acpi.c will try to create a tunnel if all the ACPI entries exists
that indicate a tunnel, but the current xHC doesn't support tunnel detection.
usb_acpi_find_companion_for_device(struct usb_device *udev)
{
...
/* Tunneled USB3 devices depend on USB4 Host Interface, set device link to it */
if (udev->speed >= USB_SPEED_SUPER &&
udev->tunnel_mode != USB_LINK_NATIVE)
usb_acpi_add_usb4_devlink(udev);
}
-Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 8:55 [PATCH 0/2] DWC3 link tunneling state reporting Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-05 8:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] usb: host: xhci: Allow non-Intel usb_link_tunnel_mode reporting Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-05 12:14 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-05-07 10:40 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-07 12:48 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2026-05-07 12:53 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-07 13:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2026-05-05 8:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] usb: dwc3: Notify XHCI core of tunneled status Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-06 23:40 ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-05-07 10:34 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-07 17:46 ` Jack Pham
2026-05-07 22:46 ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-05-08 12:04 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-08 23:31 ` Thinh Nguyen
2026-05-11 9:06 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-05-11 18:44 ` Sven Peter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=803cc760-93f3-429e-bae3-669f86c07585@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rthoorpu@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=usb4-upstream@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox