From: Peter Waechtler <pwaechtler@mac.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump - as root not only if euid switched
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:14:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8046885.1082704472016.JavaMail.pwaechtler@mac.com> (raw)
On Thursday, April 22, 2004, at 10:05PM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
>
>
>On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Peter W�chtler wrote:
>>
>> > hm, OK. There's a window in which someone can come in and recreate the
>> > file, but the open is using O_EXCL|O_CREATE so that seems safe enough.
>>
>> So here is the updated patch with an open coded call to sys_unlink
>
>Aughr.
>
>Wouldn't it be much nicer to just refuse to overwrite files owned by
>anybody else?
>
>In other words, I'd much rather see a patch that is a much simpler one,
>which just says: if we opened an existing file, we won't touch it if we
>weren't the owners of it.
>
>That should be safe for root _and_ it should be safe for people who
>already had a file descriptor open previously (hey, if the previous
>root-owned core-file was world readable, then what else is new?)
>
the previous core was owned by user.donttellyourwisdom
The root process happily dumps it's core into it, doesn't change
ownership nor permissions.
>Tell me why this isn't simpler?
>
I can't it's simpler.
If you are interested in the core (you don't because you don't make
errors, you don't even use debuggers but change the VM ;> )
you get it, otherwise you have an old one.
>
>---
>--- 1.111/fs/exec.c Wed Apr 21 02:11:57 2004
>+++ edited/fs/exec.c Thu Apr 22 13:03:27 2004
>@@ -1378,6 +1378,8 @@
> inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode;
> if (inode->i_nlink > 1)
> goto close_fail; /* multiple links - don't dump */
>+ if (inode->i_uid != current->euid || inode->i_gid != current->egid)
>+ goto close_fail;
> if (d_unhashed(file->f_dentry))
> goto close_fail;
>
>
>
next reply other threads:[~2004-04-23 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-23 7:14 Peter Waechtler [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-23 15:35 [PATCH] coredump - as root not only if euid switched Albert Cahalan
2004-04-23 19:14 ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-23 17:22 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-04-23 7:46 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-23 7:16 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-23 17:10 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-23 19:05 ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-22 9:40 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-22 9:56 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-22 19:43 ` Peter Wächtler
2004-04-22 19:53 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-22 20:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-04-22 8:51 Peter Waechtler
2004-04-22 8:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-21 19:20 Peter Wächtler
2004-04-22 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8046885.1082704472016.JavaMail.pwaechtler@mac.com \
--to=pwaechtler@mac.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox