From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
Cc: Hakan Lennestal <hakanl@cdt.luth.se>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.0, test10, test11: HPT366 problem
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 11:01:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8094.974804486@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011210112530.26514-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10011210112530.26514-100000@master.linux-ide.org>
andre@linux-ide.org said:
> 2.2.x and 2.4.0-xxx, do not share the same interrupt pin hack.
> Add the above stub to ide-pci.c near or at line 756 to look like 2.2,
> then retry and see if it fixes it. Then you bitch at Linus, not me,
> because it is a functional kludge, but a "kludge".
But:
1) 2.2 with your latest patches also falls over, even with the DMA timeout
workaround enabled.
2) This happens even when the offending IBM-DTLA drive is the master
on the primary HPT366 controller, and nothing else is connected.
hakanl@cdt.luth.se said:
> Udma3 seem to be rock solid though as long as it manages to pass the
> partition detection during boot up.
Strange. If it sometimes fails during the partition detection, then I'd
expect it to also fail in stress testing. Can you try repeatedly doing
BLKRRPART on it {instead of,as well as} parallel 'hdparm -t'?
If it falls over at udma3, perhaps we should blacklist it all the way down
to udma2?
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-21 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-11-21 7:39 2.4.0, test10, test11: HPT366 problem Hakan Lennestal
2000-11-21 9:29 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-21 11:01 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2000-11-21 12:15 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-11-21 12:26 ` Hakan Lennestal
2000-11-21 13:29 ` David Woodhouse
2000-11-21 18:33 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-21 20:56 ` David Woodhouse
2000-11-21 21:04 ` Mohammad A. Haque
2000-11-21 21:37 ` Hakan Lennestal
2000-11-24 20:46 ` Nathan A. Ferch
2000-11-21 18:32 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-21 19:15 ` David Woodhouse
2000-11-22 1:11 ` Andre Hedrick
2000-11-21 10:35 ` David Woodhouse
2000-11-21 10:52 ` Hakan Lennestal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-21 9:31 Hakan.Lennestal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8094.974804486@redhat.com \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
--cc=hakanl@cdt.luth.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox