public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM-runtime: Check supplier_preactivated before release supplier
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 21:33:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a67ef6-ea29-5b96-9596-6fbbb34c4961@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gSY7sJ2zsUsBeNFpT8XnL5yHd0inxh1+pXa9s1b9M50A@mail.gmail.com>


On 8/2/22 7:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 5:19 AM Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>
>>> Yes, it is very clear!
>>> I miss this important key point that usage_count is always >
>>> rpm_active 1.
>>> I think this patch could work.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> After test with commit ("887371066039011144b4a94af97d9328df6869a2 PM:
>> runtime: Fix supplier device management during consumer probe") past weeks,
>> The supplier still suspend when consumer is active "after"
>> pm_runtime_put_suppliers.
>> Do you have any idea about that?
> Well, this means that the consumer probe doesn't bump up the
> supplier's PM-runtime usage counter as appropriate.
>
> You need to tell me more about what happens during the consumer probe.
> Which driver is this?

Hi Rafael,

I have the same idea with you. But I still don't know how it could happen.

It is upstream ufs driver in scsi system. Here is call flow
do_scan_async (process 1)
     do_scsi_scan_host
         scsi_scan_host_selected
             scsi_scan_channel
                 __scsi_scan_target
                     scsi_probe_and_add_lun
                         scsi_alloc_sdev
                             slave_alloc     -> setup link
                         scsi_add_lun
                             slave_configure    -> enable rpm
                             scsi_sysfs_add_sdev
                                 scsi_autopm_get_device    <- get runtime pm
                                 device_add                <- invoke 
sd_probe in process 2
                                 scsi_autopm_put_device    <- put 
runtime pm, point 1

driver_probe_device (process 2)
     __driver_probe_device
         pm_runtime_get_suppliers
             really_probe
                 sd_probe
                     scsi_autopm_get_device                <- get 
runtime pm, point 2
                     pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay    <- set rpm 
delay to 2s
                     scsi_autopm_put_device                <- put 
runtime pm
         pm_runtime_put_suppliers                        <- 
(link->rpm_active = 1)

After process 1 call scsi_autopm_put_device(point 1) let consumer enter 
suspend,
process 2 call scsi_autopm_get_device(point 2) may have chance resume 
consumer but not
bump up the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter as appropriate.

Thanks.
Peter






  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-02 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-13 12:07 [PATCH v1] PM-runtime: Check supplier_preactivated before release supplier peter.wang
2022-06-22  6:09 ` Peter Wang
2022-06-22  6:48   ` Greg KH
2022-06-27 14:14 ` Greg KH
2022-06-27 14:27   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-28  1:49   ` Peter Wang
2022-06-27 19:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-28  1:53   ` Peter Wang
2022-06-28 15:54     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found] ` <b55d5691-0b2d-56bb-26ff-dcac56770611@mediatek.com>
     [not found]   ` <CAJZ5v0gTpv2gt_Gm9rUd+8Jmp4=ij2=J20o7qO0sC-hm=w3=_A@mail.gmail.com>
2022-06-29 16:01     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-30 14:26       ` Peter Wang
2022-06-30 14:47         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-30 15:19           ` Peter Wang
2022-06-30 16:28             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-07-01 10:21               ` Peter Wang
2022-08-02  3:19                 ` Peter Wang
2022-08-02 11:01                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-02 13:33                     ` Peter Wang [this message]
2022-10-12 10:31                       ` Nitin Rawat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80a67ef6-ea29-5b96-9596-6fbbb34c4961@mediatek.com \
    --to=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox