From: Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM-runtime: Check supplier_preactivated before release supplier
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 21:33:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a67ef6-ea29-5b96-9596-6fbbb34c4961@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0gSY7sJ2zsUsBeNFpT8XnL5yHd0inxh1+pXa9s1b9M50A@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/2/22 7:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 5:19 AM Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>
>>> Yes, it is very clear!
>>> I miss this important key point that usage_count is always >
>>> rpm_active 1.
>>> I think this patch could work.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> After test with commit ("887371066039011144b4a94af97d9328df6869a2 PM:
>> runtime: Fix supplier device management during consumer probe") past weeks,
>> The supplier still suspend when consumer is active "after"
>> pm_runtime_put_suppliers.
>> Do you have any idea about that?
> Well, this means that the consumer probe doesn't bump up the
> supplier's PM-runtime usage counter as appropriate.
>
> You need to tell me more about what happens during the consumer probe.
> Which driver is this?
Hi Rafael,
I have the same idea with you. But I still don't know how it could happen.
It is upstream ufs driver in scsi system. Here is call flow
do_scan_async (process 1)
do_scsi_scan_host
scsi_scan_host_selected
scsi_scan_channel
__scsi_scan_target
scsi_probe_and_add_lun
scsi_alloc_sdev
slave_alloc -> setup link
scsi_add_lun
slave_configure -> enable rpm
scsi_sysfs_add_sdev
scsi_autopm_get_device <- get runtime pm
device_add <- invoke
sd_probe in process 2
scsi_autopm_put_device <- put
runtime pm, point 1
driver_probe_device (process 2)
__driver_probe_device
pm_runtime_get_suppliers
really_probe
sd_probe
scsi_autopm_get_device <- get
runtime pm, point 2
pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay <- set rpm
delay to 2s
scsi_autopm_put_device <- put
runtime pm
pm_runtime_put_suppliers <-
(link->rpm_active = 1)
After process 1 call scsi_autopm_put_device(point 1) let consumer enter
suspend,
process 2 call scsi_autopm_get_device(point 2) may have chance resume
consumer but not
bump up the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter as appropriate.
Thanks.
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-02 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-13 12:07 [PATCH v1] PM-runtime: Check supplier_preactivated before release supplier peter.wang
2022-06-22 6:09 ` Peter Wang
2022-06-22 6:48 ` Greg KH
2022-06-27 14:14 ` Greg KH
2022-06-27 14:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-28 1:49 ` Peter Wang
2022-06-27 19:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-28 1:53 ` Peter Wang
2022-06-28 15:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <b55d5691-0b2d-56bb-26ff-dcac56770611@mediatek.com>
[not found] ` <CAJZ5v0gTpv2gt_Gm9rUd+8Jmp4=ij2=J20o7qO0sC-hm=w3=_A@mail.gmail.com>
2022-06-29 16:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-30 14:26 ` Peter Wang
2022-06-30 14:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-06-30 15:19 ` Peter Wang
2022-06-30 16:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-07-01 10:21 ` Peter Wang
2022-08-02 3:19 ` Peter Wang
2022-08-02 11:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-08-02 13:33 ` Peter Wang [this message]
2022-10-12 10:31 ` Nitin Rawat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80a67ef6-ea29-5b96-9596-6fbbb34c4961@mediatek.com \
--to=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox