From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
To: "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
"Liam Mark" <lmark@codeaurora.org>,
"Brian Starkey" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
"John Stultz" <jstultz@google.com>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"Tomi Valkeinen" <tomba@kernel.org>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Tomasz Figa" <tfiga@chromium.org>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
"Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
"Amol Maheshwari" <amahesh@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] Move dma-buf mmap() reservation locking down to exporters
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 13:19:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80cdf100-ef3c-23ae-5adf-bcf97fa85e72@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230402164826.752842-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
On 4/2/23 19:48, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> This patchset makes dma-buf exporters responisble for taking care of
> the reservation lock. I also included patch that moves drm-shmem to use
> reservation lock, to let CI test the whole set. I'm going to take all
> the patches via the drm-misc tree, please give an ack.
>
> Previous policy stated that dma-buf core takes the lock around mmap()
> callback. Which meant that both importers and exporters shouldn't touch
> the reservation lock in the mmap() code path. This worked well until
> Intel-CI found a deadlock problem in a case of self-imported dma-buf [1].
>
> The problem happens when userpace mmaps a self-imported dma-buf, i.e.
> mmaps the dma-buf FD. DRM core treats self-imported dma-bufs as own GEMs
> [2]. There is no way to differentiate a prime GEM from a normal GEM for
> drm-shmem in drm_gem_shmem_mmap(), which resulted in a deadlock problem
> for drm-shmem mmap() code path once it's switched to use reservation lock.
>
> It was difficult to fix the drm-shmem problem without adjusting dma-buf
> locking policy. In parctice not much changed from importers perspective
> because previosly dma-buf was taking the lock in between of importers
> and exporters. Now this lock is shifted down to exporters.
>
> [1] https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_114671v2/shard-snb5/igt@prime_vgem@sync@rcs0.html
> [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc4/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c#L924
>
> Dmitry Osipenko (7):
> Revert "media: videobuf2: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf
> mmapping"
> Revert "dma-buf/heaps: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf
> mmapping"
> Revert "udmabuf: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf mmapping"
> Revert "fastrpc: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf mmapping"
> Revert "drm: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf mmapping"
> dma-buf: Change locking policy for mmap()
> drm/shmem-helper: Switch to reservation lock
>
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 17 +-
> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c | 3 -
> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 3 -
> drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c | 217 ++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c | 8 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c | 2 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c | 7 +-
> .../gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c | 6 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c | 19 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c | 2 -
> .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 3 -
> .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-sg.c | 3 -
> .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-vmalloc.c | 3 -
> drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 3 -
> include/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h | 14 +-
> 18 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-)
>
Intel's IGT passed[1] (see Tests section) with the new locking policy,
which failed previously for the "drm/shmem-helper: Switch to reservation
lock" patch.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/116000/
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-03 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-02 16:48 [PATCH v1 0/7] Move dma-buf mmap() reservation locking down to exporters Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] Revert "media: videobuf2: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf mmapping" Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] Revert "dma-buf/heaps: " Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] Revert "udmabuf: " Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] Revert "fastrpc: " Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] Revert "drm: " Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-03 15:17 ` Christian König
2023-04-05 0:33 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] dma-buf: Change locking policy for mmap() Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] drm/shmem-helper: Switch to reservation lock Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-03 14:01 ` Emil Velikov
2023-04-03 10:19 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80cdf100-ef3c-23ae-5adf-bcf97fa85e72@collabora.com \
--to=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
--cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
--cc=amahesh@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmark@codeaurora.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tomba@kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox