public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
To: "Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Benjamin Gaignard" <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
	"Liam Mark" <lmark@codeaurora.org>,
	"Brian Starkey" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
	"John Stultz" <jstultz@google.com>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	"Tomi Valkeinen" <tomba@kernel.org>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Tomasz Figa" <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"Srinivas Kandagatla" <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	"Amol Maheshwari" <amahesh@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@collabora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] Move dma-buf mmap() reservation locking down to exporters
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 13:19:01 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80cdf100-ef3c-23ae-5adf-bcf97fa85e72@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230402164826.752842-1-dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>

On 4/2/23 19:48, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> This patchset makes dma-buf exporters responisble for taking care of
> the reservation lock. I also included patch that moves drm-shmem to use
> reservation lock, to let CI test the whole set. I'm going to take all
> the patches via the drm-misc tree, please give an ack.
> 
> Previous policy stated that dma-buf core takes the lock around mmap()
> callback. Which meant that both importers and exporters shouldn't touch
> the reservation lock in the mmap() code path. This worked well until
> Intel-CI found a deadlock problem in a case of self-imported dma-buf [1].
> 
> The problem happens when userpace mmaps a self-imported dma-buf, i.e.
> mmaps the dma-buf FD. DRM core treats self-imported dma-bufs as own GEMs
> [2]. There is no way to differentiate a prime GEM from a normal GEM for
> drm-shmem in drm_gem_shmem_mmap(), which resulted in a deadlock problem
> for drm-shmem mmap() code path once it's switched to use reservation lock.
> 
> It was difficult to fix the drm-shmem problem without adjusting dma-buf
> locking policy. In parctice not much changed from importers perspective
> because previosly dma-buf was taking the lock in between of importers
> and exporters. Now this lock is shifted down to exporters.
> 
> [1] https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_114671v2/shard-snb5/igt@prime_vgem@sync@rcs0.html
> [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc4/source/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c#L924
> 
> Dmitry Osipenko (7):
>   Revert "media: videobuf2: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf
>     mmapping"
>   Revert "dma-buf/heaps: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf
>     mmapping"
>   Revert "udmabuf: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf mmapping"
>   Revert "fastrpc: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf mmapping"
>   Revert "drm: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf mmapping"
>   dma-buf: Change locking policy for mmap()
>   drm/shmem-helper: Switch to reservation lock
> 
>  drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c                     |  17 +-
>  drivers/dma-buf/heaps/cma_heap.c              |   3 -
>  drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c           |   3 -
>  drivers/dma-buf/udmabuf.c                     |   2 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c        | 217 ++++++++----------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c                   |   2 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c    |   2 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_gem.c               |   8 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c     |   2 -
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c       |   7 +-
>  .../gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c  |   6 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_mmu.c       |  19 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c                   |   2 -
>  .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c   |   3 -
>  .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-sg.c |   3 -
>  .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-vmalloc.c      |   3 -
>  drivers/misc/fastrpc.c                        |   3 -
>  include/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.h            |  14 +-
>  18 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-)
> 

Intel's IGT passed[1] (see Tests section) with the new locking policy,
which failed previously for the "drm/shmem-helper: Switch to reservation
lock" patch.

[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/116000/

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry


      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-03 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-02 16:48 [PATCH v1 0/7] Move dma-buf mmap() reservation locking down to exporters Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] Revert "media: videobuf2: Assert held reservation lock for dma-buf mmapping" Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] Revert "dma-buf/heaps: " Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] Revert "udmabuf: " Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] Revert "fastrpc: " Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] Revert "drm: " Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-03 15:17   ` Christian König
2023-04-05  0:33     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] dma-buf: Change locking policy for mmap() Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-02 16:48 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] drm/shmem-helper: Switch to reservation lock Dmitry Osipenko
2023-04-03 14:01   ` Emil Velikov
2023-04-03 10:19 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80cdf100-ef3c-23ae-5adf-bcf97fa85e72@collabora.com \
    --to=dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com \
    --cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
    --cc=amahesh@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lmark@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=tomba@kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox