From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pj1-f49.google.com (mail-pj1-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B156394E94 for ; Thu, 21 May 2026 06:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779345030; cv=none; b=UcewkoMrSkTYRETQVHaoNIXx2WAQFTAFBl0tlidhFSaJJtMz/ZZIk/s08vW0+9l7iPzatznydVTAi++pkrjYPv+P5uOKBTtgTv1imjd+DMoJtCU3Qd7Y8G4xpNa1fJaqBDBEGEz6zfRPtpeAxcGMjuTG1SYDJPj8JFHzPSQC2bM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779345030; c=relaxed/simple; bh=INsd+a/phcgmO8C9Iu5la1Xhk3L3mxsqYPNiRjgpBcU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=k8wbZIISchHeW1/himExuC7/R5R6ZMtlCr3CW4BdvOs6FY5rFn4yPDUyW2QvUaSW6TP+iiz/PDtu9F/+ySlJ1P13dhhEU8KvdRAD2XFCe5qoJQehSTA0atiKFZ5xnHGGSjw2iPiJGBCx1EXm0o7wpbkX1vVFuoegfKL2undPdLg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=DMFVe470; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="DMFVe470" Received: by mail-pj1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3698e34a567so5003436a91.2 for ; Wed, 20 May 2026 23:30:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1779345028; x=1779949828; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yU7wIpLUjpDi+4dczL8E1lAAhwWnHyjdAM0tuVF9mxk=; b=DMFVe470I1UTNVdQuBWOo28xzGohi1uEJNM6ImgCO9VB5JvBHArRORZLnce4LSiPuA xTOepTgVPq/+GLNDmPZY2kvU8CyiICZSFmNY4GVy+mWbMks5QpZj60iTckukCncDT3wL NvGLSpiY1tv3gkaWdYxh2VhWWOJeWJk+Oi8y/BkCkeJ5oIxqKu4QjOKbo6slddwmyo8c x7kaA3dJYfMWF/Izu5NEegF9jKa/KlOokGGOLfg6u1doSBG00301JJZHesKwjglbh1eU nfkTew1MnBlx7O0meW+KOvg+VXzQ59s3iqDaG4o09FsZlAxYhQa+NhZr3cUt6d6670SO 15mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1779345028; x=1779949828; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=yU7wIpLUjpDi+4dczL8E1lAAhwWnHyjdAM0tuVF9mxk=; b=Q5RsyCddQNQ7ecsFrYtMyXJCIiWyOX1EEis/DZzfEp5XKZju0tLxMLUK+sygV2XPOw gzwAYYSzCJYEQnfWMmWvMerbUVptgKTOyK9i6UybWhhiAJvD2fiCjafG5FZKokpd6+Uc MvBs0Qt5N4izuSpfj6CKkN6xGsRQ33jP5TM/dX3Ra+zndYYNdQZWqKRTiiiETxiKnrK/ YJCicT9F37sdOqYWM4jaLCZ2lXa013pgiLqDWfGGG1Qonle8IIS81A6a3p+5C0AcpKGv umeqsSM08QPFbdtlvKKr7y58ckUBWusPyItMjRi5DwmPHev+N0bKsQAH1MioI/lbxPqB wMQA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ+IsM6XupAY4qoM92/V52uddfnMiq7/Mj5UOLlHq+XMPlJifgLpC5G8O/TScI7QTJ+UQ8cyRvN9VtbwUSo=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxnNme7YErFty+FJ7P76q7EVU5YGySXlJJZBuVe9Dnhzfe+ZNDS mwmNnAhBRscKJpGRxD2eyLl2lX8+zrzOVo2Nzq6VDsaP077e7KgOErHK X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OE+81EgvYVww3Um+Q1zWTlg2odUF7OhuUthL++uqiHu9aiQ1wegw/fy4LrpkdX vxYxrFTkJFp09GJSLlDfjp6VD34IyJRlUq9r1K6jQCVd3YBt1UZ8pT6Y78cabbJfgWwAOodNqDm Ap6gNFUgg8mtXeiwbEUeA/ALr030z4yijZlhrG+f3d2dSb+WLrEeCmdMZuZCAySug9T4csFmqgh YXrVA8w9uB5BjTBXZ0ysWeZtB7GV11UD4cwRz5d4YNP4dgzT5kuLb+0NKpO2NuEjtHwhgIZ1q0s 35XeC5fs8TvO1MNM5Na+dE0u5k5Jjh8VytacI6noHLO0hUkBN4pxpONvCOeFx+7ZSxnxe8aWDIA K/MY15q1qYqf1myFXHLgdcV0Ie6bz41qrVcZLtYJ3eAi5Z18fKJbK4JN9fC2JlakMbtCkHLIKmy SILq8FH4ibDgUptuy/h59gr9EJtFtcm9L1vICXc1ELcl7XQ8k= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:50ce:b0:369:1dcf:4a56 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-36a45637501mr1829423a91.21.1779345028014; Wed, 20 May 2026 23:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.20.13] ([136.226.252.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-36a3d2083ecsm1880772a91.16.2026.05.20.23.30.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 May 2026 23:30:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <80e68e8e-3dfd-4472-91e5-bebc67df5358@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 12:00:19 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] drm: bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: Fix DSI mode flags for stable LVDS output To: Luca Ceresoli , andrzej.hajda@intel.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, rfoss@kernel.org Cc: Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, jonas@kwiboo.se, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, marex@denx.de, valentin@compulab.co.il, philippe.schenker@toradex.com, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260412053811.662461-1-tessolveupstream@gmail.com> <20260412053811.662461-2-tessolveupstream@gmail.com> <7056b23b-ed81-4d79-b782-5cfcb0102ef7@gmail.com> <60a24977-b181-40e4-bcf6-38b65af293e2@gmail.com> <1716be56-ac43-440b-a5df-58cbf571ba95@gmail.com> <8a78aab6-918a-4bed-a913-05ecb559da4f@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: tessolveupstream@gmail.com In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 20-05-2026 23:18, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > On Wed May 20, 2026 at 2:29 PM CEST, tessolveupstream wrote: > >>>> Additionally, regarding the Tested-by tags you mentioned earlier, >>>> should I carry them forward to both patches, or would you prefer them >>>> only on the applicable patch? >>> >>> I'd say yes. People who sent these tags have tested a patch that is the sum >>> of the two future patches, so I'd say it's OK to keep the R-by on both >>> patches. >>> >> >> Okay, I just wanted to confirm one point — when you mentioned R-by, are you >> referring to the Reviewed-by tag? I wanted to make sure I understood it >> correctly before carrying the tags forward in the next version. 🙂> Thanks for your patience. We'll get to the bottom of this issue! :) > > Oops, I wrote R-by but I meant Tested-by. > Thanks for the confirmation. > I don't think you received any other (Acked/Reviewed-by) tags. > Yes, I have not received any other Acked-by or Reviewed-by tags. > Luca > > -- > Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com